"but given the fact that the early earth conditions could have naturally created the building blocks of life, perhaps after millions or hundreds of millions of years single celled organisms emerged." -- in other words, another magical explanation
your explanation of life emerging is no better evidence wise than reaper's explanation of the universe being created or life being created. Actually my explanation is infinitely better than reaper's explanation. I do not bring up agents responsible for life for which there is not a single shred of evidence. I leave Zeus, Jesus, Thor, etc. out of the picture because there is absolutely no reason to do bring them in. Quote from: Robot on October 26, 2007, 08:32:58 PMI hope one day you'll stop calling reaper an idiot and recognize that intelligent design is actually something you're programmed to believe.
I hope one day you'll stop calling reaper an idiot and recognize that intelligent design is actually something you're programmed to believe.
quadz, I'm sure that most people who'd have seen your sentence would agree that you believe natural selection governs mutations, you even said mutations are a part of natural selection.
quadz, it seemed to me like a word game.
and curing my slice!
Would it alter christian faith much, if it were historically illustrated(demonstrable) that jesus never literally existed?
Here's a weird question:Would it alter christian faith much, if it were historically illustrated(demonstrable) that jesus never literally existed?
DaHanG, you are forgetting something very important: most people are biased and sometimes lie about important things. I wouldn't be surprised if JAMA reported lies. I wouldn't be surprised if HIV didn't cause AIDS. You will never overcome your own programming. Everyone believes in intelligent design, but at the same time, some may have uncertain biases. Do we call uncertain bias a belief or just an uncertain bias? You tell me.
the end of the "Jesus was killed by Jews" idea for sure.