Author Topic: Ye Religion Thread (Read 1037147 times)

reaper · « **Reply #1530 on:** September 15, 2007, 01:46:44 PM »

I read a little bit of that, seemed like nonsense, but hey you never know. but anyways:
what do you do with this Cognitive-theoretical model of the universe.

quadz · « **Reply #1531 on:** September 15, 2007, 01:47:00 PM »

I read part of the introduction and part of the conclusion.

I found a lot of tortured leaps of logic.

Quote

some proponents of the radical Darwinian version of natural selection insist on randomness rather than design as an explanation for how new mutations are generated prior to the restrictive action of natural selection itself. But this is untenable, for in any traditional scientific context,

ReCycled · « **Reply #1532 on:** September 16, 2007, 06:41:52 AM »

Just too many big words in his theory for me. However Quadz got it right.

"I'm glad he refers to his own theory as a "supertautology." That seems accurate enough. But from what I've read I fail to see the point of the whole exercise."

jägermonsta · « **Reply #1533 on:** September 24, 2007, 12:58:32 PM »

Fairy Tales.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,297847,00.html

DaHanG · « **Reply #1534 on:** September 25, 2007, 03:39:06 PM »

The truth can be offensive.

Project[420] · « **Reply #1535 on:** September 26, 2007, 01:16:00 PM »

so can this...

DaHanG · « **Reply #1536 on:** September 29, 2007, 10:26:22 PM »

Is that supposed to be a joke about 'cramming religion down the throat'? Or is it just a crazy picture?

jägermonsta · « **Reply #1537 on:** October 03, 2007, 02:45:05 PM »

Classic

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyWEBbFwU1o

DWxchzrles · « **Reply #1538 on:** October 03, 2007, 06:23:46 PM »

DaHanG · « **Reply #1539 on:** October 04, 2007, 07:13:23 AM »

Classic indeed.

[BTF]Sigma · « **Reply #1540 on:** October 04, 2007, 07:57:32 AM »

[quote author=j

Robot · « **Reply #1541 on:** October 04, 2007, 09:59:52 AM »

This George Carlin guy doesn't seem very enlightened if he doesn't understand basic concepts like idiocy, because you can't believe anything if you are an idiot.

Also, he doesn't seem to think that there is more than one interpretation of the bible. There are lots of different interpretations.

DaHanG · « **Reply #1542 on:** October 04, 2007, 11:29:27 AM »

The way idiot is thrown around in every day language, he used it perfectly fine. I don't know why you would even attempt to make such a point.

You really think he thinks there's only one interpretation of the bible? His act wasn't simply an 'act' now was it?

Regards,

reaper · « **Reply #1543 on:** October 04, 2007, 11:48:15 AM »

Quote from: robot

This George Carlin guy doesn't seem very enlightened if he doesn't understand basic concepts like idiocy, because you can't believe anything if you are an idiot.

Also, he doesn't seem to think that there is more than one interpretation of the bible. There are lots of different interpretations.

it's stand-up comedy.

nevertheless, people use the word idiot, to call someone stupid. also, the thinking behind the act, was that the Ten Commandments were defined aribitrarily, which i find funny. you could come up with such an act for the vast majority of beliefs in the bible, so I'm not sure what you're getting at.

quadz · « **Reply #1544 on:** October 04, 2007, 12:02:21 PM »

Quote from: reaper on October 04, 2007, 11:48:15 AM

the thinking behind the act, was that the Ten Commandments were defined aribitrarily, which i find funny.

Perhaps, as the saying goes, it's funny because it's true.

Author Topic: Ye Religion Thread (Read 1037147 times)

Robot

El Box de Shoutamente