And I will continue to say that is meaningless and nonsense.
This seems like a semantic game now, for which I don't want to participate in.
So then my question is, what is "natural selection"?
No, you have implied this, and wikipedia agrees that it is different from what you were implying.Wikipedia definition: Natural selection is the process by which favorable traits that are heritable become more common in successive generations of a population of reproducing organisms, and unfavorable traits that are heritable become less common.This has nothing to do with what governs mutations.
This has nothing to do with what governs mutations.
How do you know a dice roll is purely random?
you don't have enough information to say there should be no god, at least that's my opinion.
you don't have enough information to say there should be no god, at least that's my opinion. Quote from: dahangIn general, what could be enough information? Isn't the fact that there's not a shred of evidence for god the desired way of not believing (until evidence arrives)?
In general, what could be enough information? Isn't the fact that there's not a shred of evidence for god the desired way of not believing (until evidence arrives)?
the leg you stand on isn't as strong as you make it out to be.
I understand believers of god cannot say, look at this, look at all my evidence on this sheet of paper, but the other side is lacking similar evidence as well.
quadz,when there's a lot you don't know, how can you say for sure there is life on other planets?have you seen the life? have you heard it? you dont' know a lot, you haven't even been to another solar system, yet alone stepped foot on another planets. i'm not saying I don't think there's life on other planets, because I do, but there are other possibilities.