|
81
Quake / Re: help with r1gl ( lags and low fps )  Racist Ignoramus
on November 12, 2013, 03:20:36 AM to Acer
On integrated cards that don't have dedicated video memory it helps to disable dynamic lighting -> gl_dynamic 0
82
/dev/random / Re: The Official 2013-2014 Football Season Thread  Nice Job / Good Work
on November 07, 2013, 09:54:57 PM to haunted
Stanford will take an early lead, Oregon will bring it back in the second half, but not enough to win. Stanford 27 24.
Baylor by 20 in a mid to high scoring game. About 50 25.
84
tastyspleen.net / Re: File checks? WTF!!!? Racist Ignoramus
on October 29, 2013, 03:36:58 PM to Pan
...players/cyborg/a_grenades.md2 - Like you said this file sometimes failes the check and I've seen other anticheat-users return a failed check for this stock file as well. Long time ago I had replaced the cyborg tris.md2 with the male tris.md2 and after fixing that the a_grenades.md2 seems to pass the check, at least that's what it looks like. Weird.
Since anticheat is not forced I don't really see the point of this as it only checks the anticheat users(?). I mean I regularly check 'aclist' and I've never seen more than three or four players at the same time that actually use anticheat, but now the file checks only make the few anticheat users look suspicious, kind of. I use the rg_hum from Q3 and of course that failes the check, but it would be nice to see something printed like: [anticheat] Pan has a modified sound/weapons/rg_hum.wav but at least he uses anticheat. (J/k) [anticheat] Pan failed 1 file check. O well it's no big deal but the first time I connected with the file check running it printed about five lines of failed checks for customized stuff which of course didn't look good. So I just went to change a few things back to stock... it's either that or ditching anticheat. I'm not saying I don't applaud file checks but it feels a bit half-assed  when it only checks anticheat users.Maybe I'll just upload some of the customized files, mostly sounds. (offtopic: speaking of uploading ever since the server migration my password isn't recognized and I can't acces my TS domain.)
85
Quake / Re: stfu dervish :) Racist Ignoramus
on October 29, 2013, 03:34:57 PM to Pan
sux for joo. yes, sux for me too :/ Terrible packtloss on all servers I have tried today, odd thing is that the 'lag' command tells me there is no Client to server PL but the netgraph obviously doesn't agree. (Server to client PL, perhaps?) On mutant it was so bad I thought my cpu was busy with something else in the background, untill I checked the netgraph. This was on dm a few minutes ago:
86
Trouble Shooting / Re: Who runs tastyspleen quake 2 dm servers? Please reboot.  Wins The Internet
on October 24, 2013, 07:42:51 PM to quadz
Debate is apparently prohibited. How dare anyone debate a point. Oh my god. Call the police. Tubby!? It really is you! 
87
Trouble Shooting / Re: Who runs tastyspleen quake 2 dm servers? Please reboot. Wins The Internet
on October 24, 2013, 12:59:34 PM to dervish
88
Trouble Shooting / Re: Who runs tastyspleen quake 2 dm servers? Please reboot.  Amazing Conspiracy Theory Bro
on October 24, 2013, 12:13:58 PM to caesar
There you go. Keep focusing on me.Why don't you run the goddamned WinMTR trace for 15 minutes I assume if you post to me, it is appropriate for me to respond to you. I know, call me crazy. As I said, I did the netgraph, etc., which for now I'm okay with. I'm satisfied for now with the ping/lag issues. But thank you for your concern.
89
Trouble Shooting / Re: Who runs tastyspleen quake 2 dm servers? Please reboot. Wins The Internet
on October 24, 2013, 02:36:21 AM to haunted
What a Racist Ignoramus.
90
Trouble Shooting / Re: Who runs tastyspleen quake 2 dm servers? Please reboot. Racist Ignoramus
on October 24, 2013, 02:34:13 AM to caesar
Caesar, No try again and leave it down for a few days.
|
DO YOU EVEN LIFT?
