We also need more information about the Pink Unicorn before we start weighing the strength of opposing theories.
I"m not sure what this obsession with evidence is
Default theory: a complex molecule emerged from a simple, natural history of events.Alternative theory a: a more complex entity accounts for the molecule.Alternative theory b: an even more complex entity accounts for the complex entity which accounts for the molecule.Alternative theory c: an even more complex entity accounts for the complex entity which accounts for the complex entity which accounts for the molecule.Quote from: reaperthat is really an interesting theory, but it does not resolve purpose, design, or order .Quote from: dahangThere are 4 theories stated above. As whirling said, why must there be a purpose? Why must design or order be fully understood before we reject superstitious, baseless claims?
that is really an interesting theory, but it does not resolve purpose, design, or order .Quote from: dahangThere are 4 theories stated above. As whirling said, why must there be a purpose? Why must design or order be fully understood before we reject superstitious, baseless claims?
There are 4 theories stated above. As whirling said, why must there be a purpose? Why must design or order be fully understood before we reject superstitious, baseless claims?
Insert QuoteThat looks like a horse that's been dyed pink and had an antelope horn glued to it's head with krazy glue.
So stupid.
Quote from: dahangDefault theory: a complex molecule emerged from a simple, natural history of events.Alternative theory a: a more complex entity accounts for the molecule.Alternative theory b: an even more complex entity accounts for the complex entity which accounts for the molecule.Alternative theory c: an even more complex entity accounts for the complex entity which accounts for the complex entity which accounts for the molecule.Quote from: reaperthat is really an interesting theory, but it does not resolve purpose, design, or order .Quote from: dahangThere are 4 theories stated above. As whirling said, why must there be a purpose? Why must design or order be fully understood before we reject superstitious, baseless claims?
Default theory: a complex molecule emerged from a simple, natural history of events.Alternative theory a: a more complex entity accounts for the molecule.Alternative theory b: an even more complex entity accounts for the complex entity which accounts for the molecule.Alternative theory c: an even more complex entity accounts for the complex entity which accounts for the complex entity which accounts for the molecule.
If there was a purpose for the universe (and no one knows what the universe is), life would be the first guess.
Funny what you are saying is to complex, and impossible, exists today - not that I think god is the more improbable explanation.
god doesn't add complexiity when you don't have an alternative explanation.
You are now hoping for an extraordinary[sic] amount of universes, or multiple[sic] big bangs to alleviate[sic] the probability[sic] problems. You can assume that, but that's not evidence.
The chances are not looking good that we have a great understanding of things as is
God is not in our realm of understanding scientifically, so god is not hurt by the probability[sic] problems.
only 2nd amendment gun nuts and bush voters believe in creationism and intelligent design.
how dare you your lucky to fucking even know i didnt brainwash you fuck im your only fucking hope
Also it appears there is a purpose for all things, you don't have to believe that, that's fine. design, order , perfection, and purpose are all arguments for the existence of a god.
Children are especially likely to assign purpose to everything, [...] Clouds are 'for raining'. Pointy rocks are 'so that animals could scratch on them when they get itchy'. The assignment of purpose to everything is called teleology. Children are native teleologists, and many never grow out of it.
Feel free to reject the existance of god, with no evidence, a little evidence or however much evidence you think there is.