VaeVictis:i find it funny that you even consider grammar a sign of intelligence, that itself is a very uneducated claim
I can well imagine old families acquiring and keeping power for centuries.Google for yourself 13 satanic bloodlinesand you'll get a lot of web pages detailing this stuff...here is one for y'all to ponder and dissect: http://nwomirror.tripod.com/13bloodlines.html Whether or not they get togeather periodically ,put on funny hats and enact rituals as part of the Running Everything behind the Scenes is another matter. But humans cling to their beliefs in defiance of logic and fact,so having a New World Order Hoedown and Fish Fry before setting policy regarding next years Secret Plans sounds plausible,if not factual.Here is a video about it...ret Rulers of the World - Bohemian Grove - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDVbyRJmvdsBut the strangest conspiracy I've found is that LIZARDS rule the world. Espoused by this guy:http://www.davidicke.com/articles/reptilian-agenda-mainmenu-43They can shape shift into human form,and are among us.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALtiORQ0KlY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5OeTLGqMNA&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNVYPcvqpdcI do agree that our so called leaders care very little about the Common People,and all is being shuffled towards a new feudalism...but Lizards?Why ARE George W. Bushes pupils Verticle Slits?
What the fuck is this about? Anyone think it's true?
Illuminati doesn't exist.
Well it would make it a convenient, and subsequently, an easier answer to deal with if it was made up online. The idea of NWO is not new at all, however. People all throughout history have talked about the ruling elites trying to stranglehold the world into doing what they want.Many societies and in particular certain families have come close several times over. King Louie XIV was one of the worst offenders, putting literally all of France into an extremely poor financial bracket (most of our poorest people here would be living like kings compared to that society), and made 99%+ of the money go right into his family. The result? He made one of the most decked-out wealthiest castles to live in the world had ever seen. It's still on display today actually. The public didn't like him or his successors too much after that though, as they stormed the castle and chopped off all the royalty's heads. That needs to happen here in the U.S. I think. Our politicians wouldn't be not nearly as ready to fuck over the public if we went in choppin' off their heads every time a bunch of money got spent on our tax dime. Revolutions are harder to do in the techno-militarized world we live in now tho.But Baroque France is just one example. A wicked example is the ancient Mongolian Khan family, with of course Genghis Khan, who within his reign and the reign of his successors, effectively ruled the (developed) world as it was in that period of time. Historically, his empire controlled damn near all of Asia and quite a bit of Europe, albeit for just about a hundred years or so. Long enough for him to live like a mega-king. The point is, many families have tried world domination before. It's just that now what they're trying to do is instead of being solitary entities vying for control, they're putting their efforts together in a collective push for it. The idea is they'll get back to trying to knock each other off later. For now, they're trying to rape the world as it is.As far as the killing of 90% of society goes, that needs to happen period. The Earth cannot sustain this level of life, and this goes far beyond any concept of Illuminati control or any conspiracy. It may be possible that the elites want the numbers to get wiped down to a more controllable level, but the Earth needs this to happen too anyway. It's been said that if the entire world population was to be effectively evened out per person to the level of food supply we have now, we would all be going pretty hungry at each meal. The developed world is screwing over the undeveloped side into starvation because there's not enough here anymore to support the 7+ billion of us. So yes, the population needs to be wiped down to a reasonable number. 90% gone would be far closer to that number actually. I've seen figures ranging from 250 million to 1.5 billion as a reasonable figure for the Earth to sustain itself with us here, the lower number being the absolute best. 3 billion is the upper limit. It's when we crested over that number when starvation and world problems started setting in, historically speaking.As far as the NWO actually being able to cause this to happen, not really sure about all that. They MIGHT be able to cause a war to break out which will set off a chain reaction of events that would lead to this, but more than likely that's not going to happen. What is more realistic is that they will get their world domination in the monetary way, concentrating the money more and more into their wealth stripping the world down to its bones.That means for people in the U.S. and other areas who historically have had it good, we'll get impacted, and it'll get bad, but it'll still be doable. A loaf of bread might end up costing $20 worst-case-scenario, but the wages will be increased just enough to where you're barely able to scrape by. The U.S. is very good at doing that for the population, so we won't have to worry like they will in Africa. They're fucked. lol