is MCS_FaderJok0 legit winner div4 EDL

[fdrjk]

Use your imagination.

Well, you don't have to modify your client to use a wallhack; and the screenshot you took was with R1Q2. I was just curious because you shouldn't have been kicked for a modified client unless you ACTUALLY modified your client.

 

Off topic, but...

If any of you ever notice, "haunted" received his first 3 AC hall of shame entries while testing this/getting it to work

I checked the AC stats entry, and why did you get kicked for a modified client if you were testing a wallhack?

perhaps he's testing workaround cheats bc he's admin on the tourney servers and stupid fucking kids like you are always finding new shit to try to sneak through.

I vote that fader gets banned for 1 month based on this stupid post he made and how he has the nerve to question someone about ac violations that the admins know about when he STILL cant explain his own repeated violations.

anyone second this?

PS: still waiting for an explanation of YOUR hits that isn't bullshit.

I always explained; but nobody believed me; which is a shame because it's the truth.

I'm not sure what you mean by "always finding new shit to try to sneak through.", though. I always play 100% legit with other people 100% of the time. I can redirect you to some demos of me if you think otherwise.

Regards,

 

[Whirlingdervish]

keep trying to dig up info on the hacks for razor. nobody is fooled by your little mole routine kiddo.


ever think that maybe haunted was trying all of the various hacks that we've stolen from your stupid buddy over the years just to be sure of what does and doesnt work?

link us a copy of your modified client again, and your supposed russian ping faking proxy. maybe that will convince someone you aren't totally full of shit.

I always play 100% legit with other people 100% of the time.

I'm glad you decided to qualify that statement, but it's still not true, and you still can't prove otherwise since you played people without anticheat on purpose, and used a modified client to do so. You can't even play tournament matches with a valid client. Why the fuck should anyone believe a word you say?

[fdrjk]

ever think that maybe haunted was trying all of the various hacks that we've stolen from your stupid buddy over the years just to be sure of what does and doesnt work?

In that case, he would have been caught by anticheat a lot sooner?

link us a copy of your modified client again, and your supposed russian ping faking proxy. maybe that will convince someone you aren't totally full of shit.

As I said before, the russian proxy thingy didn't work, and since it's caught by anticheat, it has no use to me; so I deleted it. If I could, however, I would modify AprQ2 so that the gl_replacemd2 cvar wouldn't work. At least in that case, AprQ2 couldn't use .md3 spiked models. I've never used spiked models in my life, so I wouldn't know.

You can't even play tournament matches with a valid client. Why the fuck should anyone believe a word you say?

Conversation with Welkin.

<Welkin> but it wasnt a mistake to include aprq2 in the allowed clients list for this season
<Welkin> as its not more flawed than r1q2
[...]
<Welkin> its been allowed

He hasn't made a statement about it at this point yet, but that's what he says. AprQ2 is allowed; and he purposefully included it in the allowed clients list.

rEGARDS,

 

[haunted]

Fader: Information in regard to me testing this exploit has all been relayed to quadz.. I even let him know everything that I do BEFORE I do it. He has always been the guy I goto to shed light on something to do with AC or anything to do with cheats. Kind of like Razor is to you. So the motive behind your statement means you a) believe Razor in thinking I cheat/"used to cheat", b) you feel like nagging me because I beat you so hard the other day that you gave up, or c) Razor's mole is fishing for specified information on the applicability of this exploit.

Whichever it is it still doesn't change the fact that you are the LAST person I would discuss ANY of the cheat testing with.

 

Also, there is actual information that allows us to KNOW that aprq2 is more exploitable than r1q2. Are you really suggesting that because Welkin said that, it negates all of this information?

[fdrjk]

Where is this "actual information"?

[haunted]

Ask razor.

[VaeVictis]

As I said before, the russian proxy thingy didn't work, and since it's caught by anticheat, it has no use to me; so I deleted it. If I could, however, I would modify AprQ2 so that the gl_replacemd2 cvar wouldn't work. At least in that case, AprQ2 couldn't use .md3 spiked models. I've never used spiked models in my life, so I wouldn't know.

see.... what i got from this statement here is that you wanted to cheat, but it didnt work with anticheat so you ditched it... meaning that if you found a way to cheat and still look legit, youd jump right on it

you are fuckin retarded....

[Sgt. Dick]

Vae's comments make sense 

[Barton]

Stop asking for admin when your legitimacy is questionable: http://q2scene.net/edl/index.php?op=descr&id=70024

[Sgt. Dick]

Fader for Admin 

[Whirlingdervish]

As I said before, the russian proxy thingy didn't work, and since it's caught by anticheat, it has no use to me; so I deleted it. If I could, however, I would modify AprQ2 so that the gl_replacemd2 cvar wouldn't work. At least in that case, AprQ2 couldn't use .md3 spiked models. I've never used spiked models in my life, so I wouldn't know.

see.... what i got from this statement here is that you wanted to cheat, but it didnt work with anticheat so you ditched it... meaning that if you found a way to cheat and still look legit, youd jump right on it

you are fuckin retarded....

I like how he completely skipped the whole "APR has been shown to have a version out there with a wallhack that works/worked with ac and that's why it's BANNED from EDL" and decided to address the other stuff that wasn't so important.

Keep on diggin that hole boy.

[fdrjk]

As I said before, the russian proxy thingy didn't work, and since it's caught by anticheat, it has no use to me; so I deleted it. If I could, however, I would modify AprQ2 so that the gl_replacemd2 cvar wouldn't work. At least in that case, AprQ2 couldn't use .md3 spiked models. I've never used spiked models in my life, so I wouldn't know.

see.... what i got from this statement here is that you wanted to cheat, but it didnt work with anticheat so you ditched it... meaning that if you found a way to cheat and still look legit, youd jump right on it

you are fuckin retarded....

First of all, the russian program? It's not a cheat IN ANY WAY. It would raise your ping in some way, but that's not a cheat in itself. Even if it DID work with anticheat, I still probably wouldn't use it. It's a very complicated program since it's all in uncoded Russian and no way to translate it. It was a mistake to use it in the first place, and I already apologized for it. I should have told someone beforehand.

I like how he completely skipped the whole "APR has been shown to have a version out there with a wallhack that works/worked with ac and that's why it's BANNED from EDL" and decided to address the other stuff that wasn't so important.

Version? 

A hacked version of AprQ2 would mean that it's completely hacked, like q2ace or Nocheat, which it's not. A wallhack will work with R1Q2 AND AprQ2. Want some proof? Why, you don't have to look farther than this very thread!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tVB_poUto8&feature=youtu.be

Which leads me to the other point;

Also, there is actual information that allows us to KNOW that aprq2 is more exploitable than r1q2. Are you really suggesting that because Welkin said that, it negates all of this information?

Of course not. I only talked to Welkin to make sure that AprQ2 isn't banned from EDL and EuroQ2L, which, as it turns out, was never banned in the first place.

Anyways, I'm still waiting on that information that shows AprQ2 is more hacked than R1Q2.

Stop asking for admin when your legitimacy is questionable: http://q2scene.net/edl/index.php?op=descr&id=70024

I wasn't asking for admin at all. My first post may have come across a little sarcastic, but it was meant to be. I was saying I would help with the GTV server if no one else will help keep it spam-free; because there is LOTS of spam in the GTV server during important matches. You've been there, right?

If Welkin or Ceba, or any other admin will be there in the GTV server to help, then that's perfectly fine by me.

Ask razor.

Sorry, he wasn't on IRC at the time. I'll be sure to ask him today. 

[Whirlingdervish]

so you're saying we should ban you on the forum and servers?

sounds good.

PS:

I like how he completely skipped the whole "APR has been shown to have a version out there with a wallhack that works/worked with ac and that's why it's BANNED from EDL" and decided to address the other stuff that wasn't so important.

Version?

A hacked version of AprQ2 would mean that it's completely hacked, like q2ace or Nocheat, which it's not. A wallhack will work with R1Q2 AND AprQ2

Notice I didn't say completely anywhere. Try putting words in someone else's mouth faggot (bundle of sticks).
APR has a built in renderer, r1q2 does not. common wallhacks will generally NOT work with both.

You know that, and you know how very hard your buddy razor has tried to get one that works around ac, but you insist on trying to bullshit people.

You also know of the APR with wallhack that was shown to exist somewhere around 2 years ago.

You also know that your faggot (bundle of sticks) buddy rebadged a version of FRK as APR v1.211 just a year ago.

Don't try to fucking lie to us you little twink bastard.

[fdrjk]

Not at all. 

PS: A modified version of AprQ2 would get caught by anticheat in an instant, so there's no way to successfully work a wallhack in that client.

APR has a built in renderer, r1q2 does not. common wallhacks will generally NOT work with both.

In that case, you'd simply use a different wallhack? There exists wallhacks that work on both R1Q2 and AprQ2. Saying that "common" wallhacks don't work on one client is dumb.

 

You also know of the APR with wallhack that was shown to exist somewhere around 2 years ago.

Actually, I wasn't aware of that. Even so, it would easily be caught by anticheat for a modified client.

Also, are you sure you heard about it and not actually seen it?

You also know that your faggot (bundle of sticks) buddy rebadged a version of FRK as APR v1.211 just a year ago.

I would not be surprised if he "rebadged" a version of FRK as R1Q2 either.

 

[Whirlingdervish]

Funny how you think you know so much about how anticheat works.

Sounds like you've been trying to cheat. OH YEAH YOU WERE.