Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - plastik

Pages: [1] 2 3
1
Trouble Shooting / Re: Logitech LX700 wireless mouse issues.....
« on: May 30, 2008, 02:28:57 PM »
"I think that just about covers it."

really?  you haven't covered anything at all. 
-
"Paradox? There is nothing contradictory."

you might want to look back at what you said prior to that, that makes it contradictory. :)
-
"I am aware of this. Are you aware that you are an idiot for saying it?"

well obviously you weren't aware of this (or just trying to squirm your way out again) because you insisted that, and I quote..

"whatever the fuck THAT is, was a little before my time. Hehe, yeah, I remember how all the stupid high school dorks used to classify people based on the genre's of music they listened to."

and I said "emo isn't just classified by the music you listen to"

lol you even said 'whatever the fuck THAT is'.  but now you say you're 'aware'? priceless. 

moving on...
-
"I've learned how to PROPERLY QUOTE OTHER FUCKING POSTS even though I was never a forum moderator here"

I'm a rebel like that.  I'm proud of you though.  maybe it will fill the void your mommy couldn't :)
-
"Still wasn't as RESPONSIVE/ACCURATE as I was hoping. "

hahahaha.  and I quote..

"If by "less responsive" you mean "less sensitive to movement", I gotta disagree. The one I had was VERY sensitive. TOO sensitive, in fact. It made fine aiming with a railgun damn near impossible."

first it's TOO RESPONSIVE/SENSITIVE, now it isn't as responsive/sensitive as you were hoping for?   OWNED. E. P. I. C. Fail.  :busted:

get your story straight...but being fagolar, I don't expect anything to be straight about you. :)

it would be more accurate if your sensitivity was lowered. there is no denying that. 

yeahs thats right, just aim down and limp back towards the border.
-
NEXT!
-



2
Trouble Shooting / Re: Logitech LX700 wireless mouse issues.....
« on: May 30, 2008, 02:17:17 PM »
"The argument is over. You agreed with me. Forgot already?"

hah, just as soon as you post those latencies in milliseconds the argument will be over (in my favor) :)
-
"I haven't had to take anything... you haven't been insulting."

make believe...things children are made of :)
-

"Wow you're original?"

please post proof of anyone else around here saying that :)
-

"Not really. They are both cars? The mice are both mice? You're an idiot. Keep em' coming!"

lol and I bet I can make my mouse 'race' around the screen just as quickly or as slowly as you.

apples. and. oranges.  :)
-
"This was over a few posts ago when you admit that wireless devices have connectivity issues."

and wired devices have cut or chewed cord issues, the 'cord getting caught on things' issue, and the extra 'drag' from the cord.  cord management, rf management...same thing.  connectivity issues are pretty much non existent when compared to the greater numbers of people without problems. just like you don't put your rf receiver anywhere where it can be 'interfered with', you don't put your cord anywhere it might get snagged or get in the way of anything on your desktop (like putting a book on it for example)
-
"You really are in your own world. "

yes you should visit it some time, it's called 'reality'.

-
"So I have go as far as to make a video for you? This is just getting retarded."

yes you do now get on it if you want to cross the finish line :)
-
"What world are you in? You didn't prove anything with that. Just that you're a complete fool. "

lol what part of 'gotcha there' didn't you understand?  was it 'gotcha' or 'there'?  or both? I'll send you a memo next time to warn you are about to be owned.
-
"Quote from: plastik on Today at 10:13:21 AM
at least I can give them credit for being better at argueing than both of you..

Once again... I guess you missed it and didn't correct it? Your point? No point. Stop talking."


lol well it seems that you're NOT correct :)
since your post was made at...

"« Reply #43 on: Today at 10:59:52 AM »"

and my post was edited to add new parts into it at..

"« Last Edit: Today at 10:38:01 AM by plastik »"

you're telling me you spent nearly an hour writing that post?  HAHAHA.  your wasted time = my happiness.

which is it?  stop talking or keep talking?  you're like a woman who can't make up her mind. 
-
"You're almost has bad as kobra"

HAHAHA
-
"Proof, what now? I think I've proved enough already today. "

proof of this so called proof?
-
"What? You're really digging for shit to say now to the point your completely mixed us up."

lol you already admitted you only started to argue to be an asshole. 

I'll quote you..

"Obviously your strategy is to act like a retard and make stupid comments while attempting to be clever which in turns makes the other person frustrated at your stupidity so much that they are forced to just give up.""  lol but that's exactly what you admit to trying to do.

remember, you're telling me more about you, than you think you're telling me about me  :beer:
-
"Yeah... that's why people fuck child... their weak? No point in this statement, another failed attempt to be clever."

well then you tell us why mr. pedophile.  I don't hear of child molesters molesting adults. maybe it's because they are weak? but then again, you're the pedophile, so you'd know why your kind does it better than me :)
-
"ROFL. You're so lame dude... re-read the insult you just tried to put together... I mean come on? Try harder..."

with you, there I don't have to try :)
-
"Nice back peddling... it went from Wireless mice are flawless to yeah... sometimes they have their problems. Talk about fail..."

please quote where I said mice are flawless, wired or not :)
-
"I bet you're so proud of that demo too! LOL The fact you made a demo of that cracks me up."

wheres your proof of getting mega?  EPIC fail for you. I don't see a demo of it, so you obviously can't get the mega! :)
-
"You're certainly pretty cocky when it comes to Quake 2 it seems."

lol how do you go from 'certainly' to 'it seems'.  hahahaah.
-
"You jumped right on to my comments, defending a false statement then completely turned your position around to agree with me. "

I refer you to..

"whats the next best thing to having someone agree with you?  claiming they agree with you! "

and I refer you to my cock, which is leaving bruises on your face from all of the slapping around.
-

still waiting on that latency report :)
-
 :owned:


3
Trouble Shooting / Re: Logitech LX700 wireless mouse issues.....
« on: May 30, 2008, 12:45:50 PM »
lol and you're not shitting out of your mouth?

maybe when you grow up into a big spider boy you can stick the landing.

oh and quit dodging the question I asked multiple times... how many milliseconds is this 'latency' you speak of in wireless mice?

Look plastik! You're copying the same shit I pull on you! Wow you're just a 'master debater'... Pathetic.

 :afro:

Type all the 'lol' and smileys you want. We all know deep down you're ticked off and struggling to breathe. Need a hand?

 :busted:

really, I am copying you?  name one time in this thread where you claimed I was dodging the question. 

still not seeing an answer to that question...maybe because your entire argument hinges on it being an insanely high number :)

even if I was copying you, you can dish it out but can't take it?..(even though there is no copying going on, haha)

there isn't enough 'fail' gifs or pics in the world to compliment you :)

LOL@you for arguing just to argue, and getting owned at it.

4
Trouble Shooting / Re: Logitech LX700 wireless mouse issues.....
« on: May 30, 2008, 12:43:30 PM »
"Ohhhh because it doesn't work I must be lying? Right.... makes sense! "

lol and mine is still working. I doubt you even did the 'test' :) but if you want to prove it show me some believable video :)
-

"Stupid point... AGAIN. You're such a fool. "

not stupid...just gotcha there :)
-
"Oh in that case... do you think they would race a Toyota hybrid in a Formula 1 race? No. "

apples and oranges :) ...especially considering I can move my mouse around the screen just as fast as you and interference free as you :)
-

"You made a stupid comment and I absolutely corrected you. You are even agreeing with me now. Need a ladder to climb out of that hole? I don't debate the fact I started shit with you, it's fun and passes time at work. Picking on weak people is a great time."

classic example of believing what you say is true without anything to back it up.. how does this comment even go with the one you were replying to? 

"I don't debate the fact I started shit with you, it's fun and passes time at work."

lol then you've already lost.  you've already proven you'll make up bs just to keep the argument going. 

"Picking on weak people is a great time."

 you know who else likes to pick on the weak?  pedophiles.
-
"Perhaps you missed it? Oh shit... you must be an idiot! You spelled a word wrong?! burrrrrrrrrrrrn!"

lol well you have to prove I spelled it wrong first :) and even if I did I refer you once again to..

"so much for you saying I use firefox spellcheck then "

-
it is funny that your logic makes you think that by keeping me arguing and dragging it on, even if I shoot your statements down, you some how 'win'.  let me assure that it is a false sense of hope for you :). you're the type of person that...even if you 'lose'.. as long as can convince yourself you've won..that's good enough for you :) don't worry little timmy! we'll put a '#1' over that 3rd place trophy and make your booboo all better.
-

"Huh? This holds as much ground as it did before... just another shovel digging you deeper."

proof? :)
-
"Only thing that is burning me out is arguing with a dumb fuck like yourself. Obviously your strategy is to act like a retard and make stupid comments while attempting to be clever which in turns makes the other person frustrated at your stupidity so much that they are forced to just give up."

that's odd...since you admitted this was your strategy :)
-
"You're ugly!
No you're ugly!
You're ugly!
No you're ugly!"

I disagree, you're not ugly..you're pretty, and sensitive...like flower..or a pussy!  you sure your brain isn't wireless?  because you seem to have some interference and latency/syncing problems :) a.k.a. retarded.
-
"Happens enough to reject wireless mice from an gaming environment. Enough said. Wireless devices are faulty and not as reliable as wired. That is the end all statement that you even agree with."

whats the next best thing to having someone agree with you?  claiming they agree with you!  from the start I said both had their drawbacks..I have no preference to wired or wireless, you just made it out to be like I was by posting inaccuracies in your assessments of wireless mice :)
-

"I heard you can't even make the jump to the mega health in dm1... pretty good representation of you trying to argue with me."

lol there is a demo of me getting mega in the demo's forums.

I don't need mega to whoop your ass  :nana:
-

""So close.... maybe next time plastik.".... "

yes maybe next time you will argue over something with merit behind you :) it's a crazy world anything could happen! 








5
Trouble Shooting / Re: Logitech LX700 wireless mouse issues.....
« on: May 30, 2008, 11:56:03 AM »
:lolsign: :lolsign: :lolsign: :lolsign:

This thread gets better and better each time plastik shits out his mouth.

Keep it up!

 :yessign:

lol and you're not shitting out of your mouth?

maybe when you grow up into a big spider boy you can stick the landing.


oh and quit dodging the question I asked multiple times... how many milliseconds is this 'latency' you speak of in wireless mice?

6
Trouble Shooting / Re: Logitech LX700 wireless mouse issues.....
« on: May 30, 2008, 11:48:57 AM »
"Why would you admit it's common? Then you'd be back peddling which you are pretty much starting to do by admitting there is chance of interference. Regardless of the occurrence of that chance it's still enough to not use a wireless mouse or wireless anything for that matter in a gaming environment."

lol because it isn't common.  if it happened all of the time no one would buy or be able to sell them.
-
"For shits and giggles I was just fucking around with a cheap logitech cordless mouse. With the receiver on the desk I could communicate with the computer (with the wireless latency feeling of course). I put the receive on the floor and I could no longer communicate with the computer. You tell me what went wrong with the rf?"

odd.. putting my receiver on the floor has no effect on my mouse whatsoever, and never has.  one of us is telling a lie, and it's you :)
-
"Here we go! You admit they have issues! Debate over. You fail. Lets continue with the personal stomping of you though..."

I've been saying that from the start if you just noticed.  as I recall fagolar clearly shot down your argument without even knowing it :)
if they almost never happen, then there is nothing to debate about.  do you think they would stop making vehicles because of a few car accidents?
-
"All I heard was... that plastik was run out of the community. I certainly see why now."

go back to my first post in this thread and look at it.  honestly all bullshit aside, there was nothing in there that should of pissed anyone off because it wasn't meant to.  you see, you think I'M the problem, when you're the shit starter.  I was trying to have a perfectly normal and laid back conversation/debate. of course you won't admit this because you would realize you're the one at fault :)
-

"*you also spelled arguing wrong."

oh did I? where? so much for you saying I use firefox spellcheck then :)
-

"So people made fun of you and picked on you so you ran off like a child? I know this already."

lol no the rules they broke had nothing to do with me or anything they said towards me.  for example, I altered a post title in the demo's section because we had strict guidelines so that searching of demo's through the forum search would be easier.  they purposely went out of the guidelines and I fixed it. and a few times where their arguments got out of control (not with me) and were moved to the entropy pool (which was common practice). then they cried about me abusing admin privs for doing so, which console wasn't buying. however I do believe I did edit one of adrens written posts one time and was given a tiny 'warning'. :)
-
"Umm... you honestly think you won this stupid debate? You've made a complete ass of yourself so far and you have no idea, that's the best part. "

that's odd, I was thinking the same about you :)
-
"Huh? If that was the case then that statement would be a toss in your direction for an excuse to pull yourself out of the hole you've dug."

i refer you to..

"squirming for any reason eh?'
-
"That's a joke right?"

just throwing fuel on the flaming fags so you can burn yourself out :)
-
"You're right, we've already established that interference does happen. Enough to not consider a wireless device for gaming. The end."

and I've established interference doesn't happen enough to be problematic, if it happens at all to most people :)
-

I'll tell you some things that thousands of people have heard after losing to me in a game... 'iwin' and 'owned' gg :)



 

7
Trouble Shooting / Re: Logitech LX700 wireless mouse issues.....
« on: May 30, 2008, 11:24:49 AM »
Quote
last time I checked before I left I was owning the trolls stalking me, in game (with a ball mouse)

 :shifteyes:


don't mind me, people.. just stirring the pot.

I don't mind, we're taking turns holding him down while the other one wiggles it up his butt. Grab an arm, join the fun.  :badgrin:

don't air your homosexual fantasies you have about me :)

8
Trouble Shooting / Re: Logitech LX700 wireless mouse issues.....
« on: May 30, 2008, 11:24:01 AM »

"Stuck with me? Am I at fault for having a fucking memory now? I'm sorry that I'm not the forgetful marshmallow-brained dopehead that you probably are."

mmm...nerves...they cause pain...and you cry.

-
"What's odd about it? You talk about ALL subjects as if you are the foremost authority."

by all means list all of these subjects that I talk about like I'm the foremost authority.  I write what I know about or have experienced.  when you start talking about detailed specs on the space shuttle, let me know I'll be sure to not have anything to add :)
-

"No, I just know that I'm dealing with someone who is really stupid"

yet you call me stupid and still deal with me of your own accord...it's a paradox!
-

"I love it when idiots break out the emo cutdowns. Emo, whatever the fuck THAT is, was a little before my time. Hehe, yeah, I remember how all the stupid high school dorks used to classify people based on the genre's of music they listened to."

emo doesn't have to have age or music preference boundaries :)
-

"......It didn't go so well for them? What, did you send the mafia to go work on his legs with baseball bats? Am I supposed to be afraid of something now? I'd love to meet you in person, just remember to bring an extra pair of undies, 'cause you'll shit the ones you came in. My intention is not to wear you down, christ on a stick you have such an over-inflated sense of reality. This is the fucking internet, retard. My reason for doing this is for sheer amusement. If you want me to actually wear you down, you're gonna have to hop a plane and come to me. By all means, make it "not go so well for me" too. What the fuck is a stupid cocksucker like you going to do, huh? Once again, suck my cock, whore!"

lol you didn't seem so amused when you were screaming 'console delete my account!!'.  my address is in longitude and latitude on the MK forums in my profile...meet you there :) I find it, again, ironic that you say 'this is the fuckin internet' but at the same time threaten me with physical harm (thats when you know you've dug down into them deeper than lex steel does white women) lol and now I gotta come to you?.  just remember we don't have free health care in the USA, so you're going to have a long limp back to the border. you like to fantasize about men sucking your cock eh? mommy not give you the tit enough or to much? lol you're so angry at me, now you're e-stalking me. pathetic. 
-
"does e-age equal e-power or something?"

lol no it just means I am not out of my element, which is what you stated because you thought I just joined TS.
-
"Wow, that's neato. "

thanks :)  what have you done for the community?
-
"
With each and every sentence you get stupider and stupider. Are you doing one shot of draino after every two sentances, or are you really that stupid? Jesus, does someone have to wipe your ass for you? Does someone cut up your food before you eat it? How the fuck you see THAT as proving your point about anything is...
FUCKING RETARDED
...just like you.

Wow, the sensitivity can be lowered by changing settings!!! HOLY FUCK, YOU'RE A FUCKING GENIUS!!! ...oh wait, no, you're still stupid. Because I changed the settings, captain obvious. It was still too sensitive. If by "responsive" he meant "accurate", he is most certainly still correct. The polling rate and reports/sec are LOWER, PERIOD! Now shut the fuck up and go back to MK where you belong. You're out of your element over here."

oooh big letters.. stop it you're scaring me!  with letters that large you should be able to intimidate anyone!  the question isn't if someone has to wipe my ass for me or cut up my food for me, the question is...do you want to do it honey?  I usually have a stricter criteria, but you can qualify as a bitch.  :)

"It was still too sensitive"

there are different ways to change the settings, in windows control panel, in the drivers and in any software that may come with the mouse (and in the q2 settings).  you're telling me that at the lowest settings it was somehow still to sensitive?  HAH.  (since I'm a bible beating child rapist) lord, he knows not what he says, please forgive him.  infact, the more sensitive by default the better because you can always lower it.  maybe you're just used to 800dpi mice instead of 1600dpi mice :)
-
"If by "responsive" he meant "accurate", he is most certainly still correct."

 I love how you unknowingly smash jagers argument, yet are now trying to change your 'meaning' in his favor.  you just said it was to sensitive which is basically the same thing as 'responsive'.  responsive doesn't mean accurate, and you said it was 'too responsive', meaning small movements equal big movements on the screen..which of course as I stated can be fixed with proper settings. 
-










9
Trouble Shooting / Re: Logitech LX700 wireless mouse issues.....
« on: May 30, 2008, 10:40:05 AM »
Yawn

:zzz:

rofl you must be haunteds father!

10
Trouble Shooting / Re: Logitech LX700 wireless mouse issues.....
« on: May 30, 2008, 10:32:10 AM »
*too

 ;)
lol...I actually purposely left the extra 'o' out to see if he would notice..thanks for ruining it :)



11
Trouble Shooting / Re: Logitech LX700 wireless mouse issues.....
« on: May 30, 2008, 10:13:21 AM »
"They don't match up. Wireless mice don't have the same engines as wired performance gaming mice. That was the point I was making.

When RF is working properly sure, but add in interference."

how common is wireless mouse interference?  not very common at all.  I could put my cell phone in between my mouse and my receiver and I would not have any interference.  I could do the same with an FM transmitter or a wireless modem and still have no problems with the mouse.  short of completely encasing the receiver in a thick dense rf absorbing material or a mountain between your mouse and the receiver, you won't have any line of sight problems. 

you make it seem like even if there is no interference, wireless mice are to unresponsive.  even WITH interference the wireless mouse may not have any differences at all in regards to latency or accuracy of the transmission data. 
-

"Basically you're saying RF doesn't require line of sight but it does..."

really?  then how do you listen to the radio behind feet of concrete in a parking garage? or in your home for that matter? signals bounce. the signal can always find a way to reach it.  in most new remote controls you don't even need to point your remote at the device, you can even point it in the opposite direction.

-
"I called you a nerd because your way of insulting somebody in an argument is to point of flaws in grammar of a quickly typed post."

you're the one that said dumbfuck...so obviously I had to point out what a hypocrite you were, especially calling someone a nerd, when you yourself are getting angry over a discussion about mice.
-
"So all the claims are false. Only what ever has happened in plastik's life holds any ground. Plastik doesn't have a cancer, so people don't die as a result of it all the time. Plastik doesn't have sex, so humans don't breed."

wireless mice problems are not false, just a VERY low probability of happening unless you're working to make it happen. 
-
"As far as I'm aware. You were run out of the Tastyspleen community. You have a horrible reputation, you were worn down and I can feel you being worn down again. You're a very weak person plastik and those are the type of people I have the most fun with. I hope you stay this time, I really enjoy shitting all over people such as yourself."

lol yes, I was run out of the TS community..and how was that?  last time I checked before I left I was owning the trolls stalking me, in game (with a ball mouse) and in forum. q2 is an addictive game, and before you know it hours pass by, sometimes we need to spend more time in the real world :)  none of the admins ever asked me to leave nor did they remove my server/forum access privs...so how exactly was I run off?  by not having the time to argue with 10 idiots like you all day long over the simplest non provoking posts? I am one man with only 2 hands and a life. however if you look back I had some help :)

I refer you back to my original statement, what happened to those people? As I recall they were mostly all run off from MK (and TS) because no one would put up with their bullshit (some even changed their handles).  maybe you don't realize that when I was a moderator as TS, they purposely broke the rules so I would have to take action, just so they could complain about me to the other admins.  guess what? they weren't falling for their bullshit.   

at least I can give them credit for being better at arguing than both of you..you're small potatoes :)
-
"or because the manufacture just did a horrible job producing the mouse"

squirming for any reason eh?
-

"So to explain this to you again... The latency/unresponsive issues I'm referring to have nothing to do with the sensitivity settings of the mouse. The issue of latency/unresponsiveness is common with wireless mice. Whether it be because of low batteries or interference between the receive and the mouse or because the manufacture just did a horrible job producing the mouse, the problem exists. You can deny it up and down all you want but deep down... you know it's there."

please list this latency in milliseconds.  like I said before it would be negligible. if it is lower than your ping there is no damage (and it isn't even near that high in any case).  what unresponsive issues?  interference?  we've already established that interference happens VERY rarely, and most can use a wireless mouse their entire life with no problem at all, cheap or expensive. first you say the mouse is to heavy, but we have people saying some are to sensitive (imagine if it was lighter), now it isn't responsive enough?  when you move the mouse, it moves exactly when you move it...how more responsive can you get?  should it move before you even think about it?  responsiveness and sensitivity are basically the same exact thing.  the mouse moves in basically REAL TIME. since the RF signals go to a receiver, the only slow down is the time it takes to get from the mouse to the receiver, which is pretty much instantaneous. now I ask you again, list this latency in milliseconds since you're the god of mice knowledge.   

better yet, show me a video of 2 mice, one wired one wireless, side by side with the same specs and settings.
-

"Hey look. You took something I said and turned it around on me again. You're so clever!"

to clever for you :)
-




12
Trouble Shooting / Re: Logitech LX700 wireless mouse issues.....
« on: May 29, 2008, 11:10:11 PM »
"Actually, wireless mice WILL sometimes disconnect from the receiver causing you to have to punch the sync buttons madly before you get fragged."

not once in 4 years did this happen to me...odd for a 5$ mouse. you'd probably have a better chance of winning the lottery than your receiver disconnecting.
-

"you are not a beacon of light. You do not know EVERYTHING. "

lol when I told you that, it must of stuck with you pretty well...maybe I hit a nerve....embrace the truth, don't bury it. :)
-

"When we want to know how to properly pull off empty posturing, we'll come to YOU for advice"

odd, since jager is the one doing the 'empty posturing'...and now so are you.
-

"P.S., suck my cock, whore."

lmao now I know I really hit a nerve.  probably somewhere near your colon cause you got raped. 

here you are, sitting, waiting to pounce on me for hurting your girlish [EMo] feelings, talking about stuff from another thread on another forum.  HAHAH.

maybe you should do some research and find out what happened to the last groups of trolls that tried to gang up on me in the forums.  long story short, it didn't go so well for them...and it still isn't.  you're not going to wear me down one bit...you could of at least learned that by now.
-

"Run along back to MK where you can pretend to be an admin, you're out of your element over here."

lol you're new, so I'll give you the heads up. I've been at TS longer than you might think, infact I was at TS years before MK even existed (and I was here for years before even jager came around).  I ran a server, I 'invented' the TS500, designed/ran the tourney site, and I was a forum moderator at TS  (which I gave up on my own accord) you like the demo's section?  yeah that was my idea (although I'm sure more than just me wanted somewhere to put demo's).  lol, so trust me when I say I am not out of my element at TS, and trust me when I say if anyone were to belong here more, it would be me...even on just contributions alone.  don't let the lack of posts on my 'new' account fool you just because I stopped playing q2 for a while :)
-


"If by "less responsive" you mean "less sensitive to movement", I gotta disagree. The one I had was VERY sensitive. TOO sensitive, in fact. It made fine aiming with a railgun damn near impossible."

so basically you just shot down jagers entire argument, thanks. that sensitivity can be lowered through changing settings. now all jager has left to stand on is the complaints about changing batteries and 'interference' (which is basically the same as 'cord management') and even that still isn't much to stand on.  I mean you don't complain about your cellphone running on batteries or your mp3 player right?  if you want wireless, you need some way to get power to the wireless device and until we can safely beam electricity to a mouse in a cheap manner, we're going to have to make due with internal power sources for wireless devices.   

13
Quake / Re: Popular Spectator Myths
« on: May 29, 2008, 10:37:42 PM »
well I know it is possible to code an mIRC script that can do basically the same thing with a few dll's (but might be buggy or not able to handle much load performance wise). and of course things like these are possible to program with 'minimal' effort.  r1ch already has his own client/server, I'm sure he could build off of that to make a spectator relay, not necessarily from 'scratch'. if it wasn't for people making suggestions some things wouldn't ever be made.  programmers aren't exactly known for their imaginations. just kidding.  kinda  :peace:

on a side note, I am mostly well aware of what actions can be programmed and what requires to much work or what is virtually 'impossible'.

get to work!  :bondage:

14
Bot Drop / Re: banned from all Tastyspleen servers? :(
« on: May 29, 2008, 04:09:10 PM »
lol someone please tell me he isn't trying to use the 'I wasn't home' approach.

someone broke into his house, ate his homework, and then loaded up hacks on q2 and played for a few hours on his computer.


 :owned:

15
Trouble Shooting / Re: Logitech LX700 wireless mouse issues.....
« on: May 29, 2008, 02:25:59 PM »
"The fact they can run out on you or reduce the performance of your mouse at any given time no matter what you're doing is still a pain in the ass. Fact."

and some people think the cord is a pain in the ass.  fact.  :ubershock:

-

"Exactly my point. The fact that wireless mouse spec settings do not compare to performance wired mice. Thank you."

as long as the dpi, polling rate/report per second, etc all match up, they should be pretty much on par.  do you even know how fast RF 'physically' travels compared to wires?  the difference is negligible, especially over a few feet.
-

"In the same statement you said I was wrong then went ahead and agreed with me. Wow..."

please by all means quote this statement you think I made that contradicts itself.  8)
-

"Again... you're completely avoiding the fact you're wrong and the facts that prove it. "

how can I avoid facts when you aren't using any?  :bigshades:
-

"You certainly have the wrong perception of me if you think I'm angry at the world. Learn that I just enjoy picking on people such as yourself for making stupid, ignorant comments or accusations."

nice job admitting that you're being an asshole needlessly, and enjoying it while at the same time being angry at others.  if you wanna go back and read from the beginning, you'll realize I haven't provoked anything, the anger is all coming from one direction, you.  we'll make you the poster boy for wired mice. happy now?

this is an exact depiction of how you came into this thread..  :bomb:

-

"No. It's because you come off like some ignorant, bible belt, little sister touching, simple man. "

I don't mind wireless mice so I must believe in the bible, and touch little girls because of it..hah!  however if you have a cute little sister and she is above 18, send her this way and I'll make a woman out of her. :sex_algida:

-

"I don't argue with them because I have to work with them."

I refer you to..

"you probably don't argue with them because you can't look a person in the eye, face to face when they stand their ground. you're afraid of someone being right or not even caring about buying into your BS, so you come online and call people 'dumb fucks' hiding behind your keyboard, letting off frustrations of the world not being exactly how you want it to be, of people not agreeing with everything you say, of every idea you have being as insignificant as the dog shit on your lawn."

 :brutale_63:

-

"Wow look who got angry. Nice lines, is that a copy and paste of something said to you in the past? Judging by your past comments I'm willing to bet it is."

no, I took extensive courses in sociology and psychology years ago :)

 :SignHereDevil:

-

"Oh christ. Let me dedicate the next two hours of pointing out all the grammatical errors in your posts. Please... Talk about a keyboard warrior. Typical nerdy forum shit. You're such a tool."

irony. look it up.  you accuse people of being ignorantly religious, but say 'Oh Christ'.  typical nerdy forum shit?  coming from someone baby whining about mice on a forum?  please do dedicate the next two hours to pointing out all of the grammatical errors in my posts.  although I'm willing to bet your time will not yield the results you hope for.

 :smiley_aafs:
-

"If it wasn't for Firefox's spell check you'd be in deep shit I guess."

lol, firefox has a spellcheck?  I guess you would know.  :nana:
-








Pages: [1] 2 3