1
dm / Re: 888 needs to be muted 
Well-Reasoned Argument and/or Conclusion
on August 17, 2022, 10:32:58 AM to Sgt. Dick
I agree, over censorship is a bad thing.
|
Pages: [1]
Well-Reasoned Argument and/or Conclusion
2
tastyspleen.net / Re: Ratings  Preposterously Irrational Arguments
on September 29, 2021, 11:47:17 AM to Sharkie
overreact much? Nope, not in the slightest and certainly not when you consider the nature of this thread. I put a * update on my post to show that i'm ignoring him now, i know a chronic arsehole when i see one. You overreacted by posting about it, it's already done and finished. 
3
tastyspleen.net / Re: Ratings  DO YOU EVEN LIFT?
on September 29, 2021, 08:55:59 AM to Sharkie
Having an issue with people negatively rating you just invites more negative ratings aimed to mess with ya. The rating system was meant to be humorous and fun. What is this oblivious patronising crap? are you trying to troll me? That's a real bad take you've got there captain obvious, it'd be a shame if someone were to point out the large flamewar about people maliciously giving each other negative rates for their own sick fucking pleasure that this thread is mostly composed of and the fact that YOU are a part of it. I'll have an issue with whomever i please and i don't give a toss about negatives rates because, if i remember correctly, negative rates disappear if you delete the posts they're on and if a post gets so negatively rated that it gets censored then you can just repost all/part of the contents of a censored post elsewhere, negative rates mean nothing. Did you NOT notice the * updates on my post clearly focusing on the humour/fun involved in this? Do you even read bro? why'd you even post that? Lol! this guy!  Calm yourself down, it's just a joke right? i'm definitely laughing (at you) right now.  Are you someone else i should put on ignore?  Hey XANA, good fun, stay salty.  * Oof haunted, is giving me a negative rate the best you've got? Yeah i think i'll just ignore you from now on.
Pages: [1]
|