Sk1llSh0t vs Alpha - Wallhacks?

[console]

if i had a spiked model, quake would render it as the model and the demo would have recorded it.

Just FYI - quake demos don't work that way.

Q2 demos consist of a minimal stream of information from the server like entity positions and messages and the names of the player model/skin being worn.

It's up to the client viewing the demo to perform the rendering, and all rendering is performed using texture and model data from the client's Q2 folder.

[|iR|Sk1llSh0t]

Ah. I just assumed it was all recorded but that makes sense. My ignorance of the matter only goes to prove my point even more .

[bluemeanies]

Skillshot...when it comes to Alpha...I recommend adopting console's policy as follows...

These days, my official policy is I give exactly zero fucks about whatever Alpha decides to complain about...

...there really was no reason for you to take your valuable time to post your demo of the game just to appease a whiny cry babby...especially considering you have respect from players around here and he has absolutely none...

[|iR|Sk1llSh0t]

Skillshot...when it comes to Alpha...I recommend adopting console's policy as follows...

These days, my official policy is I give exactly zero fucks about whatever Alpha decides to complain about...

...there really was no reason for you to take your valuable time to post your demo of the game just to appease a whiny cry babby...especially considering you have respect from players around here and he has absolutely none...

Thanks blue! I'll keep that in mind for future reference

[fdrjk]

Anyway, spiked models as you have hinted would have shown up in the demo if i was using them. so that argument is invalid.

not if you made a whole new one that was undetectable. i do recall a conversation you had with fader about wallhacks about a few months back saying how easy it would be to make a new wallhack to get passed anticheat checks, almost like you two were bragging about it, and look at what has happened to fader over the past week or so. just saying

It takes someone with at least some coding knowledge to get one past anticheat. Besides, do you REALLY think skillshot would go through that much trouble just to hack?! What makes you think he's that kind of person? It's kind of clear from his posts he doesn't really know everything about anticheat, so what the fuck makes you think he'd know how to code an undetectable wallhack?

And I want you to know I do not wallhack. I know the basics of anticheat and what to and not to expect. YOU, on the other hand are about as mendable as silly putty. You'd listen to people and think that that's the absolute truth without considering the other circumstances. Don't talk about shit you know absolutely nothing about.

SkillShot doesn't hack. End of thread. Move on.

[haunted]

Update:

The honorable Judge Muffin has received solid evidence via pastebin concerning this matter. The source disclosed the information under the condition his/her testimony remained anonymous, and will be admissible in proceedings tomorrow.

[|iR|Sk1llSh0t]

lol haunted

[fdrjk]

I will represent SkillShot. Before Slick Lawyer gets his dirty mitts on him.

[adz1La]

I know he used them once.

[fdrjk]

. You'd listen to people and think that that's the absolute truth without considering the other circumstances. Don't talk about shit you know absolutely nothing about.

SkillShot doesn't hack. End of thread. Move on.

well you two were talking about how easy it would be to get a new wallhack past AC weather u want to admit it or not. And i am still not convinced about skillshot. for someone to have such a big jump in their game play overnight smells a bit off.

As for haunted sticking his bib in i have seen numerous times since the XANAgate, haunted refuse to play you because he thinks you hack, adren thinks you use spiked models, so accusing someone of cheating isn't knew 

Saying one hacks < knowing one hacks with evidence. I'll say it again; SKILLSHOT DOES NOT HACK. To my knowledge, he's played for a number of years, so of course he knows when to fire around corners.

By the way, I got accused of cheating a lot even before all this, so no, it isn't "knew". Only this time, it isn't retarded ffa noobs and shitty admins accusing me. 

[VaeVictis]

fader... there is a big difference from accusations, and finding your name/ip in the anticheat hall of shame... you obviously have proven yourself not above hacking, only have yourself to blame if no one trusts you

[fdrjk]

I already proved I wasn't hacking with those violations.

[haunted]

No, you did not prove/convince anyone that there was no foul play.

[fdrjk]

http://tastyspleen.net/quake/forums/index.php?topic=18750.0

[haunted]

What is in there, that is conclusive enough to act as solid evidence of you not using spiked models?

What absolute, concrete evidence is there that you did not have any kind of cheat loaded up when you weren't AC valid?

Just because you give an explanation for why you're in the AC hall of fame for 2 different types of violations, it does not act or provide us with any kind of "proof" that there was no foul play..

so stop pretending like it does. For someone so informed with how anticheat works, it's kind of funny. If you are so stubborn/childish that you can't admit why your explanations don't constitute as "proof", then I will just delete your posts.

Best wishes,

haunted