There could be universal morality in my opinion.
Morality is in the eye of the beholder.
Quote from: [BTF] Reflex on March 09, 2011, 08:19:02 AMMorality is in the eye of the beholder.in islam's sha'ria law it's perfectly acceptable and infact encouraged for men to dominate their women into subjugation. i hold that the subjugation of autonomy is immoral. in all cases, once we understood the autonomy of slaves, we rid ourselves of the terrible ignorance. once we realized the autonomy of women is the same as men, we allowed them to stop being property and vote in our government.what you say by your quote is that morality is either subjective or relative. if it is subjective, then it is meaningless as a means of self governance and how we interact with the world (both natural and social). if it is relative, then there are many contradictory rules in this world. this would also point to morality being meaningless if this were the case.
As for absolute morality: "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."In other words, what goes around, comes around. So if you want good things from others, do good things for others. Anything else is just evil.
Quote from: reaper on March 09, 2011, 10:43:56 AMThere could be universal morality in my opinion.by universal morality, do you mean that god is subject to this universal morality too? or does he invent these rules? that is my question.Quote from: [BTF] Reflex on March 09, 2011, 08:19:02 AMMorality is in the eye of the beholder.in islam's sha'ria law it's perfectly acceptable and infact encouraged for men to dominate their women into subjugation. i hold that the subjugation of autonomy is immoral. in all cases, once we understood the autonomy of slaves, we rid ourselves of the terrible ignorance. once we realized the autonomy of women is the same as men, we allowed them to stop being property and vote in our government.what you say by your quote is that morality is either subjective or relative. if it is subjective, then it is meaningless as a means of self governance and how we interact with the world (both natural and social). if it is relative, then there are many contradictory rules in this world. this would also point to morality being meaningless if this were the case.so i hope you're wrong about that reflex.
I know I've mentioned Sam Harris' book, The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values, in another thread fairly recently.
Quote from: quadzI know I've mentioned Sam Harris' book, The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values, in another thread fairly recently.science doesn't need to, god has already done it
Quote from: reaper on March 16, 2011, 09:52:14 AMQuote from: quadzI know I've mentioned Sam Harris' book, The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values, in another thread fairly recently.science doesn't need to, god has already done itScience doesn't need to what?Science has no NEEDS. God doesn't exist. SHUT THE FUCK UP WITH THAT RETARD SHIT.
Quote from: Whirlingdervish on March 16, 2011, 11:24:30 AMQuote from: reaper on March 16, 2011, 09:52:14 AMQuote from: quadzI know I've mentioned Sam Harris' book, The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values, in another thread fairly recently.science doesn't need to, god has already done itScience doesn't need to what?Science has no NEEDS. God doesn't exist. SHUT THE FUCK UP WITH THAT RETARD SHIT.You can try and understand morals all you want, but god has already set them up properly. In other words there's little need to try and figure them out, they've already been handed down.