Re: Creation science

[FYATroll]

Well now that I read the thread the debate I was going to start really doesn't fit. I wasn't going to argue evolution vs. biblical creation, but was just going to argue the evidence that there is a God. However, this thread wasn't really about that and even if it was it's just difficult if not impossible to carry out a meaningful debate about something that serious on the internet.

[quadz]

I wasn't going to argue evolution vs. biblical creation, but was just going to argue the evidence that there is a God.

I'm interested in what evidence you might have in mind.  Is it the existence something in nature you feel could not have been produced by natural processes?  Or ...?

[FYATroll]

I wasn't going to argue evolution vs. biblical creation, but was just going to argue the evidence that there is a God.

I'm interested in what evidence you might have in mind.  Is it the existence something in nature you feel could not have been produced by natural processes?  Or ...?

Things along that line, yes.

[quadz]

I'm interested in what evidence you might have in mind.  Is it the existence something in nature you feel could not have been produced by natural processes?  Or ...?

Things along that line, yes.

Something one might find relevant:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ba2h9tqNYAo

^^

"Presenting biological and evolutionary evidence to refute creationist claims about irreducible complexity.
Starts off pretty simple but delves into some nice details tracking genetic evolutionary paths of single celled -> multi celled organisms, etc."