Author Topic: naymlis vs ah! q2rdm2 Feb 2009  (Read 6730 times)

Offline hieronymous

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 188
  • Et tu Brute
    • View Profile
  • Rated:
Re: naymlis vs ah! q2rdm2 Feb 2009
« Reply #15 on: March 19, 2009, 09:17:31 PM »
True

but I still say that it was poor play for naymlis or perhaps it is just not his map
  • Insightful
    Informative
    Funny
    Nice Job / Good Work
    Rock On
    Flawless Logic
    Well-Reasoned Argument and/or Conclusion
    Demonstrates Exceptional Knowlege of the Game
    Appears Not to Comprehend Game Fundamentals
    Frag of the Week
    Frag Hall of Fame
    Jump of the Week
    Jump Hall of Fame
    Best Solution
    Wins The Internet
    Whoosh! You done missed the joke thar Cletus!
    Obvious Troll Is Obvious
    DO YOU EVEN LIFT?
    DEMO OR STFU
    Offtopic
    Flamebait
    Redundant
    Factually Challenged
    Preposterously Irrational Arguments
    Blindingly Obvious Logical Fallacies
    Absurd Misconstrual of Scientific Principles or Evidence
    Amazing Conspiracy Theory Bro
    Racist Ignoramus
There is an idea of a Patrick Bateman, some
kind of abstraction, but there is no real me, only an
entity, something illusory, and though I can hide my cold
gaze and you can shake my hand an

Offline haunted

  • Moderator
  • Irrepressibly Profuse Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10147
  • I am hollywood.
    • View Profile
  • Rated:
Re: naymlis vs ah! q2rdm2 Feb 2009
« Reply #16 on: March 21, 2009, 10:50:20 AM »
I can see where both of you are coming from... but does everyone see where naymlis is coming from in this duel? Naymlis doesn't play conservative tournament-style like your life depends on it defense. He's not going to wait for opportunities, he's going to create opportunities.... Even against opponents that aren't that defensive, he will often make them adapt a defensive strategy for the duel. This is because his outlook on a q2 duel is to pressure your opponent, from as many points possible and as fast as possible, into a position that they're not as comfortable in.... because it's more fun and it's the way you SHOULD duel, imo... but bottom line, yes naym was a little sloppy but he was playing his fast-paced game that works even when he's not on. Sometimes he is on.

Also I doubt either player took this game seriously.
  • Insightful
    Informative
    Funny
    Nice Job / Good Work
    Rock On
    Flawless Logic
    Well-Reasoned Argument and/or Conclusion
    Demonstrates Exceptional Knowlege of the Game
    Appears Not to Comprehend Game Fundamentals
    Frag of the Week
    Frag Hall of Fame
    Jump of the Week
    Jump Hall of Fame
    Best Solution
    Wins The Internet
    Whoosh! You done missed the joke thar Cletus!
    Obvious Troll Is Obvious
    DO YOU EVEN LIFT?
    DEMO OR STFU
    Offtopic
    Flamebait
    Redundant
    Factually Challenged
    Preposterously Irrational Arguments
    Blindingly Obvious Logical Fallacies
    Absurd Misconstrual of Scientific Principles or Evidence
    Amazing Conspiracy Theory Bro
    Racist Ignoramus

Offline hieronymous

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 188
  • Et tu Brute
    • View Profile
  • Rated:
Re: naymlis vs ah! q2rdm2 Feb 2009
« Reply #17 on: March 21, 2009, 04:42:36 PM »
I can see where both of you are coming from... but does everyone see where naymlis is coming from in this duel? Naymlis doesn't play conservative tournament-style like your life depends on it defense. He's not going to wait for opportunities, he's going to create opportunities.... Even against opponents that aren't that defensive, he will often make them adapt a defensive strategy for the duel. This is because his outlook on a q2 duel is to pressure your opponent, from as many points possible and as fast as possible, into a position that they're not as comfortable in.... because it's more fun and it's the way you SHOULD duel, imo... but bottom line, yes naym was a little sloppy but he was playing his fast-paced game that works even when he's not on. Sometimes he is on.

Also I doubt either player took this game seriously.


I would say that is a good assessment

  • Insightful
    Informative
    Funny
    Nice Job / Good Work
    Rock On
    Flawless Logic
    Well-Reasoned Argument and/or Conclusion
    Demonstrates Exceptional Knowlege of the Game
    Appears Not to Comprehend Game Fundamentals
    Frag of the Week
    Frag Hall of Fame
    Jump of the Week
    Jump Hall of Fame
    Best Solution
    Wins The Internet
    Whoosh! You done missed the joke thar Cletus!
    Obvious Troll Is Obvious
    DO YOU EVEN LIFT?
    DEMO OR STFU
    Offtopic
    Flamebait
    Redundant
    Factually Challenged
    Preposterously Irrational Arguments
    Blindingly Obvious Logical Fallacies
    Absurd Misconstrual of Scientific Principles or Evidence
    Amazing Conspiracy Theory Bro
    Racist Ignoramus
There is an idea of a Patrick Bateman, some
kind of abstraction, but there is no real me, only an
entity, something illusory, and though I can hide my cold
gaze and you can shake my hand an

Offline playboy

  • Carpal Tunnel Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1533
    • View Profile
  • Rated:
Re: naymlis vs ah! q2rdm2 Feb 2009
« Reply #18 on: March 22, 2009, 11:55:58 AM »
no no, i played as if my life was on the line.  :busted:
  • Insightful
    Informative
    Funny
    Nice Job / Good Work
    Rock On
    Flawless Logic
    Well-Reasoned Argument and/or Conclusion
    Demonstrates Exceptional Knowlege of the Game
    Appears Not to Comprehend Game Fundamentals
    Frag of the Week
    Frag Hall of Fame
    Jump of the Week
    Jump Hall of Fame
    Best Solution
    Wins The Internet
    Whoosh! You done missed the joke thar Cletus!
    Obvious Troll Is Obvious
    DO YOU EVEN LIFT?
    DEMO OR STFU
    Offtopic
    Flamebait
    Redundant
    Factually Challenged
    Preposterously Irrational Arguments
    Blindingly Obvious Logical Fallacies
    Absurd Misconstrual of Scientific Principles or Evidence
    Amazing Conspiracy Theory Bro
    Racist Ignoramus
I wish haunted would RTFM

Offline haunted

  • Moderator
  • Irrepressibly Profuse Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10147
  • I am hollywood.
    • View Profile
  • Rated:
Re: naymlis vs ah! q2rdm2 Feb 2009
« Reply #19 on: March 22, 2009, 12:17:50 PM »
 :oops: :sorry: :busted:
  • Insightful
    Informative
    Funny
    Nice Job / Good Work
    Rock On
    Flawless Logic
    Well-Reasoned Argument and/or Conclusion
    Demonstrates Exceptional Knowlege of the Game
    Appears Not to Comprehend Game Fundamentals
    Frag of the Week
    Frag Hall of Fame
    Jump of the Week
    Jump Hall of Fame
    Best Solution
    Wins The Internet
    Whoosh! You done missed the joke thar Cletus!
    Obvious Troll Is Obvious
    DO YOU EVEN LIFT?
    DEMO OR STFU
    Offtopic
    Flamebait
    Redundant
    Factually Challenged
    Preposterously Irrational Arguments
    Blindingly Obvious Logical Fallacies
    Absurd Misconstrual of Scientific Principles or Evidence
    Amazing Conspiracy Theory Bro
    Racist Ignoramus

Offline Arm0r

  • Phenomenally Prodigious Member
  • **
  • Posts: 3014
  • Gentlemen.
    • View Profile
  • Rated:
Re: naymlis vs ah! q2rdm2 Feb 2009
« Reply #20 on: March 22, 2009, 10:48:29 PM »
 :forceac:
  • Insightful
    Informative
    Funny
    Nice Job / Good Work
    Rock On
    Flawless Logic
    Well-Reasoned Argument and/or Conclusion
    Demonstrates Exceptional Knowlege of the Game
    Appears Not to Comprehend Game Fundamentals
    Frag of the Week
    Frag Hall of Fame
    Jump of the Week
    Jump Hall of Fame
    Best Solution
    Wins The Internet
    Whoosh! You done missed the joke thar Cletus!
    Obvious Troll Is Obvious
    DO YOU EVEN LIFT?
    DEMO OR STFU
    Offtopic
    Flamebait
    Redundant
    Factually Challenged
    Preposterously Irrational Arguments
    Blindingly Obvious Logical Fallacies
    Absurd Misconstrual of Scientific Principles or Evidence
    Amazing Conspiracy Theory Bro
    Racist Ignoramus

Offline naymlis

  • Swanky Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 942
    • View Profile
  • Rated:
Re: naymlis vs ah! q2rdm2 Feb 2009
« Reply #21 on: November 30, 2009, 10:30:28 PM »
i agree with hieronymous, shitty game but thanks for making the video :)
  • Insightful
    Informative
    Funny
    Nice Job / Good Work
    Rock On
    Flawless Logic
    Well-Reasoned Argument and/or Conclusion
    Demonstrates Exceptional Knowlege of the Game
    Appears Not to Comprehend Game Fundamentals
    Frag of the Week
    Frag Hall of Fame
    Jump of the Week
    Jump Hall of Fame
    Best Solution
    Wins The Internet
    Whoosh! You done missed the joke thar Cletus!
    Obvious Troll Is Obvious
    DO YOU EVEN LIFT?
    DEMO OR STFU
    Offtopic
    Flamebait
    Redundant
    Factually Challenged
    Preposterously Irrational Arguments
    Blindingly Obvious Logical Fallacies
    Absurd Misconstrual of Scientific Principles or Evidence
    Amazing Conspiracy Theory Bro
    Racist Ignoramus

 

El Box de Shoutamente

Last 10 Shouts:

 

|iR|Focalor

April 24, 2024, 10:55:53 AM
omlette du fromage?
 

Admin

April 24, 2024, 07:08:22 AM
fin.
 

|iR|Focalor

April 22, 2024, 04:27:07 PM
Now it's over. Because I say it's over.
 

|iR|Focalor

April 22, 2024, 12:39:29 PM
It's over when I say it's over.

 

|iR|Focalor

April 22, 2024, 11:34:16 AM
Costigan needs a tampon.
 

Costigan_Q2

April 22, 2024, 02:53:12 AM
This interaction is over.
 

Costigan_Q2

April 22, 2024, 02:51:20 AM
Will someone please muzzle and leash that barking dog? it's projections and delusions and now endless babbling are comically pitiable, just treat it like you would Beaver - that's what it deserves.
 

Costigan_Q2

April 22, 2024, 02:50:50 AM
Quake 2 needs a public square.

This is not a debate.
 

|iR|Focalor

April 21, 2024, 05:36:24 PM
If you were attached to reality, you'd realize that.

Quake 2 needs a private bathroom.
 

|iR|Focalor

April 21, 2024, 05:34:35 PM
I've never doxed anyone like he did or sent them 1000's of annoying whiny angry messages in all caps like you.

Show 50 latest
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 04, 2024, 04:02:07 AM

Login with username, password and session length