it's probably extinct for a good reason.
Mixing mammoth and modern elephant baby batter will probably produce a somehow deficient species.
Should we start cloning other prehistoric creatures too?
OK i might skip the velociraptors, but...
Quote from: |iR|Focalor on January 18, 2011, 08:04:12 AMit's probably extinct for a good reason. Given the estimation that 99.9% of all species that ever lived are now extinct, I think the reasons for extinction must usually be rather mundane.
Quote from: |iR|Focalor on January 18, 2011, 08:04:12 AMMixing mammoth and modern elephant baby batter will probably produce a somehow deficient species.If the cloning is successful, it won't be a mix in the standard reproductive sense. The modern elephant would be used for gestation, but the cloned DNA would be a direct copy of that of the original mammoth. (Again, assuming they're able to obtain an undamaged copy in the first place.)
Quote from: quadz on January 18, 2011, 08:43:04 AMQuote from: |iR|Focalor on January 18, 2011, 08:04:12 AMit's probably extinct for a good reason. Given the estimation that 99.9% of all species that ever lived are now extinct, I think the reasons for extinction must usually be rather mundane.Depending on what you mean precisely by "mundane", I have to disagree. A "mundane" reason for extinction would be man hunting down ALL of the buffalo in North America in less than 25 years, which damn near happened. Then again, maybe mankind hunted the wooly mammoth into extinction, who knows.Maybe this is flawed logic, but I tend think of extinction being caused by environmental factors, either internal or external. Either the species can't sustain itself on the resources provided by it's current habitat, or there are other environmental factors which precipitate it's demise. I think the two main theories as to why as dinosaurs became extinct are the ice age and a meteor crashing into the earth's surface causing the earth to spew out lava which either consumed them all or gave off toxic gases which were unbreathable.
I personally think it's an obvious mistake to do this. For one, it's probably extinct for a good reason. Mixing mammoth and modern elephant baby batter will probably produce a somehow deficient species. Either it'll be physically disabled to some degree, or somehow biologically disabled (possibly sterile or with a weak immune system). What if the result is an animal with extremely aggressive tendencies? I don't see what great beneficial scientific discovery could come from it. Just seems like a HUGE waste of money to me. Should we start cloning other prehistoric creatures too? Sure, it's an interesting concept, but I don't think it's beneficial to mankind in any way.