1
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1] 2
3
railz / Re: Playing Rails Again« on: March 26, 2018, 08:36:16 AM »
holy shit this guy
whalecum back 4
art, music, etc. / Re: Post Musical Equipment Here....« on: March 21, 2018, 03:38:47 PM »
The wank is strong with this one.
5
art, music, etc. / Re: Post Musical Equipment Here....« on: March 19, 2018, 09:51:54 PM »I'm not familiar with that particular box. From Googling, I see on Reverb.com a little 1-in/1-out single chickenhead knob stomp box sized box that I guess is a simple attenuator. Looks like a black plastic box with a sticker decal for the label. Looks cheap as fuck and shitty honestly. The description says you're supposed to put it in the amps loop. So if you're using it between the guitar and the amp... don't do that. goes on the FX loop, it's not very effective and only 1 to 2 of 11 are really usable before blasting out the neighbors. It also mutes the treble a bit, guessing from loss of signal due to the potentiometer or resistor in there? Quote Maybe it's just a shitty attenuator. One of these Mesa Boogie 5 band EQ's That boogie unit looks more legit, i'll add this to my christmas list. Quote
Channel 1 (clean) only works with volume knob. Works as you world expect. Channel 2 (distortion) Has gain which is pre-amp( plus boost button for even more filth ), and the master knob to raise the overall volume. My main issue is that the sensitivity of both the volume, and master knobs goes from zero to rock star before the first hash mark is even reached. 6
art, music, etc. / Re: Post Musical Equipment Here....« on: March 19, 2018, 04:23:58 PM »
Got it taken care of, it was actually pretty damn easy. Next issue, I have this shitty volume box(omnisonic) that i'm pretty sure came with the amp. With it on there the tone sounds like hot garbage. Got any tricks to attenuate so I can crank this thing but maintain a reasonable volume without slaughtering the tone? 7
Quake FAQs, HOWTOs, and Articles / Re: What mouse are you using?« on: March 13, 2018, 04:42:24 PM »
I wasn't done ranting, but my flight started boarding.. Now I'm back!
What a better mouse WILL do is have a higher polling rate and improved fine accuracy when compared to a cheaper shittier mouse with worse specs. USB has 100x the bandwidth needed to handle mousing duties. The difference between and good mouse and a shitty one is the on-board processor. Optical mice are essentially cameras that take and compare pictures to interpret motion. Older examples didn't have the ability to process this on-board the mouse itself and this duty was shared with your PC. This is where polling rates came into play, now that it's all done on chip at the mouse polling rates are largely irrelevant. Any good HID chip will be polling over USB as fast as possible (1000hz for 1ms response time in most cases) Quote
Lasers are less prone be disturbed by anomalies like reflections compared to traditional optical sensors this is why they tend to work better on shiny surfaces. Most have moved on to infrared sensors these days anyway, this is why you're not seeing that light under your mouse anymore. A good infrared sensor will track on anything short of an electropolished surface. ( <10μm variance) Thanks to advances in manufacturing technologies imaging sensors have gotten cheaper, and algorithms have gotten better, therefore you can spec a superior sensor capable of capturing higher resolution, and have a faster processor handling things. When you see XXX "gaming mouse" they always advertise DPI ratings first. This being better is a bit of a false statement alone. No-one uses 15-gazallion DPI setting, as the mouse would be interpreting tracking at such a great distance per movement it would be unusable. This get's scaled up or down at some point with different DPI settings. But in general mice true high dpi ratings have superior processors, and error correction algorithms which are less prone to spazzing out during fast flick movements like railing, or other movements such as lifts. I just wish they would give relevant details like sensor megapixel values, or processing speeds, etc I disagree. They ALL make them equally shitty. I've got a Razor Deathadder that I was stupid enough to pay about 90 bucks for. We're not disagreeing. Razor makes a shit product along with many others. What you end up paying for is largely marketing, and in their case software development. Their mice mechanically are the same as your $20 logitech. They do tend to use better off the shelf hardware for things like cables, and switches however but their mechanical design is largely fluffy garbage. The quality switches I mentioned have zinc plated contact surfaces which aren't susceptible to corrosion. These and will outlast the the rest of the mouse plus another 20 years in the ocean. I guess my whole point is that we were developing optical sensors that will track faster, and more accurately on any surface than any of us fragerts can move our fappin appendages and this was >10 years ago. Pick the mouse that fits your meat mitten the best and play more. I recommend Corsair, Steel Series, and yes some Razors if you want the best sensors. (pixelart, keyance) 8
Quake FAQs, HOWTOs, and Articles / Re: What mouse are you using?« on: March 13, 2018, 05:47:54 AM »
Logitech tends go with the cheapest option available when it comes to the pots, and mechanical switches they use in their products. These have raw untreated copper contacts that corrode overtime when exposed to oxygen not to mention all the other pubes, sweat, and cheeto crumbs introduced during your intense fragging(fapping) sessions. Kind of a bummer as they have great design, and use solid optical sensors otherwise.
9
Quake / Re: Is it possible to intentionally lag your client?« on: March 11, 2018, 12:17:21 PM »
Normal, wifi payers most likely with packet loss. Serial laggers crisco, whipl@ash, and pepp come to mind.
10
/dev/random / Re: Got a Pet? Show'em off here!« on: March 04, 2018, 01:26:46 PM »
I miss my birdie, he was a smart little fucker.
Now we have these tards. 11
art, music, etc. / Re: Post Musical Equipment Here....« on: March 03, 2018, 11:58:17 PM »And THANK GOD FOR THIS GUY. You stuck the bottom of youtube there, time to go outside. Or watch this, kid is pretty entertaining. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wa30fWRLOUE 12
art, music, etc. / Re: Post Musical Equipment Here....« on: March 03, 2018, 11:53:41 PM »
Makes sense, my buddy has the "mk3" Quote I would let a qualified amp repair guy do that if I were you. It takes the proper size soldering iron and solder pump to correctly do that stuff without damaging the board it's connected to. And those boards were done by robots, not something an inexperienced unsteady hand should be messing with. Alright headed over to good ol Radio Shack! Nah, no EE here just a ME but I oversee a cutting edge manufacturing facility with machines averaging around 500k a pop. I've soldered PCBs once or twice a million in times my days, I got dis. 13
art, music, etc. / Re: Post Musical Equipment Here....« on: March 03, 2018, 12:08:34 PM »
Did a little poking, it's the channel switch. I tried to clean it but no dice, too much corrosion.( probably because I never use the clean channel? ) I sourced a replacement online, it'll be an easy swaparoo. I think a lot of the Crate hate stemmed from when they moved production overseas? I'm not a snob or anything but I think this little guy sounds pretty darn good. This one has survived this long with me so i'll keep it for the long haul. These combos gotta be near unicorn status at this point. 14
art, music, etc. / Re: Post Musical Equipment Here....« on: March 01, 2018, 03:51:47 PM »
You guys know anything about repairing these things? I've had this blue voodoo for 20+ years. Its got a bit of random snap crackle and popping when it's cold but still works ok. I'm pretty sure it's just the pots, can I just go to town on this with some electronics cleaner? I don't play much these days, too many broken bones limiting my range of motion but I still try to dabble here and there.
Pages: [1] 2
|