1
Jokes / Re: Bogus IR Dirvish/MOUTH FACE
« on: December 06, 2014, 09:18:08 AM »
I probably should have replied to this late yesterday but martini time was calling.
It was unclear at first if dervish was referring to AcmeCTF file checks or Tastyspleen file checks as we don't currently use the same hashes. I have no problem cooperating on hashes if that would help alleviate concerns....some files used on TS do not pass our checks.
Our hashes are no doubt more limited and do not include many of yours so I was under the impression the complaint was Beaver not passing our checks...which I am well aware of but I have yet to see anything of what we consider a "cheatable" nature in his models, etc.
Granted, we haven't reviewed his files because they haven't been submitted for review and added if valid. I have no problem adding hashes for different files as long as they do not give an advantage in game but I'm not going to waste my time on daily changes just because someone wants to "see what it looks like".
We are AC optional, except for IPs or subnets forced AC due to previous history or strong suspicion, and have not had any problem with Beaver attempting any cheats. If he did, he would be either forced AC on our servers or summarily banned depending on the offense.
Glad to see this is somewhat sorted out now.
It was unclear at first if dervish was referring to AcmeCTF file checks or Tastyspleen file checks as we don't currently use the same hashes. I have no problem cooperating on hashes if that would help alleviate concerns....some files used on TS do not pass our checks.
Our hashes are no doubt more limited and do not include many of yours so I was under the impression the complaint was Beaver not passing our checks...which I am well aware of but I have yet to see anything of what we consider a "cheatable" nature in his models, etc.
Granted, we haven't reviewed his files because they haven't been submitted for review and added if valid. I have no problem adding hashes for different files as long as they do not give an advantage in game but I'm not going to waste my time on daily changes just because someone wants to "see what it looks like".
We are AC optional, except for IPs or subnets forced AC due to previous history or strong suspicion, and have not had any problem with Beaver attempting any cheats. If he did, he would be either forced AC on our servers or summarily banned depending on the offense.
Glad to see this is somewhat sorted out now.