Not sure what nuke's you guys are using but mine doesn't do 100 seconds, it does 1:00.
The point is that they do 1:00 for 100, but 90 seconds still comes out as 90 seconds not 1:30.
Quote from: The Happy Friar on June 02, 2011, 07:01:55 AMNot sure what nuke's you guys are using but mine doesn't do 100 seconds, it does 1:00. The point is that they do 1:00 for 100, but 90 seconds still comes out as 90 seconds not 1:30.
Quote from: [BTF] Reflex on June 02, 2011, 09:30:44 AMQuote from: The Happy Friar on June 02, 2011, 07:01:55 AMNot sure what nuke's you guys are using but mine doesn't do 100 seconds, it does 1:00. The point is that they do 1:00 for 100, but 90 seconds still comes out as 90 seconds not 1:30.The question is a trick. 90 seconds is one minute and 30 seconds but the seconds portion of the display is 00 to 99 seconds. The elapsed time will be the time in seconds. It's perfectly reasonable for the microwave to expect you to enter the time in seconds for numbers less than three digits.Once you start entering numbers like 100, 120 it computes it modulo minutes:seconds and 100 becomes 1:00, 120 becomes 1:20, etc. The real brain fart happens when you enter numbers like 199 and get 1:99 for elapsed time of 2 minutes, 39 seconds. This is because the microwave isn't computing the seconds place modulo 60.It's impossible to put 60 + 60 into a microwave and get 1:20, AFAICT. You can enter 0:60 and get one minute and repeat it for another 0:60 or a total of 2:00.
Quote from: QwazyWabbit on June 03, 2011, 01:13:26 AMQuote from: [BTF] Reflex on June 02, 2011, 09:30:44 AMQuote from: The Happy Friar on June 02, 2011, 07:01:55 AMNot sure what nuke's you guys are using but mine doesn't do 100 seconds, it does 1:00. The point is that they do 1:00 for 100, but 90 seconds still comes out as 90 seconds not 1:30.The question is a trick. 90 seconds is one minute and 30 seconds but the seconds portion of the display is 00 to 99 seconds. The elapsed time will be the time in seconds. It's perfectly reasonable for the microwave to expect you to enter the time in seconds for numbers less than three digits.Once you start entering numbers like 100, 120 it computes it modulo minutes:seconds and 100 becomes 1:00, 120 becomes 1:20, etc. The real brain fart happens when you enter numbers like 199 and get 1:99 for elapsed time of 2 minutes, 39 seconds. This is because the microwave isn't computing the seconds place modulo 60.It's impossible to put 60 + 60 into a microwave and get 1:20, AFAICT. You can enter 0:60 and get one minute and repeat it for another 0:60 or a total of 2:00.I actually posted something similar only to have a glitch on my browser lose it before it finished being sent to the server. Thanks for pulling out the concept of modulo. I completely forgot the term for it in my non-existent first post.The problem is that the time on the microwave is 2 digits of base60 being represented in decimal numbers. The problems pointed out are manufacturers solutions to the original problems that are pretty inconsistent between brands of microwave.There actually is a system that represents the Base60 of time very well using unique symbols. It's called an analog clock. (sorry for that condescending part LOL ) In fact I once saw a really old microwave that used dials to represent the analog clock.Also, just to point out that some microwaves only allow the first digit of base60 to be 0-9 so even that is a problem. Although cooking food in the microwave rarely goes above 9 minutes anyway. (many defrosting settings that do go well above 9 minutes are handled by entering weight in decimal, not time)There are microwaves that add time. My workplace has quite a few heavy duty microwaves that do not contain a keypad and they work by incrementing time using programmable buttons before pressing start. This is probably because the keypad wears out on microwaves pretty often due to cheap parts. Also, little known fact, the warranties on microwaves usually exclude the keypad due to some unconscionably non-inclusive warranty that tends to also exclude the magnetron.P.S. I haven't used the word exclude enough... EXCLUDE!