Author Topic: The Purpose of Life (Read 55862 times)

fdrjk · « **Reply #135 on:** February 16, 2011, 06:19:38 PM »

Quote from: [BTF]Sigma on February 16, 2011, 06:09:53 PM

yahoo · « **Reply #136 on:** February 16, 2011, 07:22:39 PM »

|iR|Focalor · « **Reply #137 on:** February 16, 2011, 07:53:39 PM »

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSpgbSj5H7c

Tubby · « **Reply #138 on:** February 17, 2011, 01:37:03 AM »

Quote from: Sgt. Dick on February 16, 2011, 06:06:18 PM

Quote from: Laurelin on February 16, 2011, 04:56:52 PM
Tubby, would someone who chose celibacy be someone who's failed at the ultimate purpose of life - and therefore be useless?

Please elaborate

To add to Laurelin's question, has someone who lives a homosexual lifestyle failed at the purpose of life also

Yes. Biologically, I think a celibate or homosexual person has failed in fulfilling the ultimate purpose of life: They have failed to contribute to the continuation of life by failing to create life - which (I think) is the ultimate purpose of life.

Once again, though, that doesn't mean a celibate or homosexual person can't do great things while he or she is alive - but nature is ruthless, and no matter what that person does, they are little more (biologically) than the equivalent of a week-old piece of meat going rotten in the back of your refrigerator:

1. Useless (not contributing to the gene pool),

2. Possibly harmful (using up resources which might otherwise be used by fertile couples),

3. Taking up space (again; limited resources).

That sounds harsh, but nature is a harsh old lady...

quadz · « **Reply #139 on:** February 17, 2011, 02:00:53 AM »

Quote from: Tubby on February 17, 2011, 01:37:03 AM

1. Useless (not contributing to the gene pool),

Hardly any of us contributes to the gene pool as individuals, for the reasons stated in my prior post.

Quote from: Tubby on February 17, 2011, 01:37:03 AM

That sounds harsh, but nature is a harsh old lady...

Nature predates life.

But yes - the self-replicating molecules that built us don't care about our feelings.

Nor do they care if we breed ourselves into a tragedy of the commons.

Tubby · « **Reply #140 on:** February 17, 2011, 02:29:44 AM »

Quote from: quadz on February 17, 2011, 02:00:53 AM

Quote from: Tubby on February 17, 2011, 01:37:03 AM
1. Useless (not contributing to the gene pool),

Hardly any of us contributes to the gene pool as individuals, for the reasons stated in my prior post.

Quote from: Tubby on February 17, 2011, 01:37:03 AM
That sounds harsh, but nature is a harsh old lady...

Nature predates life.

But yes - the self-replicating molecules that built us don't care about our feelings.

Nor do they care if we breed ourselves into a tragedy of the commons.

Quadz - again - I think you're looking at this issue on a molcular level, while I (hope) am looking at it as it relates to actual human beings.

But I still don't understand your idea that "hardly any of us contributes to the gene pool as individuals".

Can you please explain that a bit further?? Thanks.

Tubby · « **Reply #141 on:** February 17, 2011, 02:32:04 AM »

BTW, all you guys who keep posting that I'm a 'troll' are simply bumping up my hit count

Thanks!!!

|iR|Focalor · « **Reply #142 on:** February 17, 2011, 03:08:02 AM »

Hit count doesn't matter, it's post count. Take a gander at my e-penis, tiny.

fdrjk · « **Reply #143 on:** February 17, 2011, 03:53:49 AM »

My e-penis is the fast-growing on tastyspleen and you all know this.

yahoo · « **Reply #144 on:** February 17, 2011, 04:15:10 AM »

Quote from: MCS_FaderJok0 on February 17, 2011, 03:53:49 AM

My e-penis is the fast-growing on tastyspleen and you all know this.

haunted · « **Reply #145 on:** February 17, 2011, 04:16:46 AM »

My girlfriend has a rare(1% of all kidney stones / are denser than calcium, and too dense to be broken up by a lithotripsy... aka very bad shit) type of kidney stone disease which in severe cases, they pass stones during every single urination. It is not likely that she/we will be able to have a child. We've been planning our engagement this summer... So what am I, condemning myself to an ultimately purposeless life by marrying her? I think the fact that I am man enough to commit to a woman with this kind of disorder is life-defining / purposeful in itself.

fdrjk · « **Reply #146 on:** February 17, 2011, 04:16:54 AM »

Quote from: yahoo on February 17, 2011, 04:15:10 AM

Quote from: MCS_FaderJok0 on February 17, 2011, 03:53:49 AM
My e-penis is the fast-growing on tastyspleen and you all know this.

And it's growing at the rate of 6 posts per day.

heheh

yahoo · « **Reply #147 on:** February 17, 2011, 04:28:49 AM »

Quote from: MCS_FaderJok0 on February 17, 2011, 04:16:54 AM

And it's growing at the rate of 6 posts per day.

heheh

Booyeah!

QuakeDuke · « **Reply #148 on:** February 17, 2011, 04:43:02 AM »

Quote from: Tubby on February 16, 2011, 01:32:12 PM

Quote from: QuakeDuke on February 16, 2011, 04:33:04 AM
Not a chance - entire colony starved. And. DON'T call me Duke.

Why call yourself Quake Duke if you don't want people to call you Duke? Lol.

One word - not two. Had it since playing both online D3D and Quake modem 2 modem - yes, before netplay. Others call themselves Duke.

Quote from: Tubby on February 16, 2011, 01:32:12 PM

Anyway, so what - in your opinion - caused an entire colony of bees to starve themselves to death when there was an abundance of food available???
Serious question - I'm curious!!

Their "survival" instinct. They cluster when it's cold and maintain a core temp of around 93 F (approx 35C). Below 55-60F they freeze to death. Rather than break cluster and freeze - they starve. Contrary to some opinions, I see a lot of same behavior in humans....
QD

|iR|Focalor · « **Reply #149 on:** February 17, 2011, 09:23:51 AM »

Quote from: haunted on February 17, 2011, 04:16:46 AM

We've been planning our engagement this summer...

Have you broken the tragic news to your penis yet?

Author Topic: The Purpose of Life (Read 55862 times)

El Box de Shoutamente