Some of these guys I've never heard of, some l strongly disagree with their ranking and some belong where they are. http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/5937559/the_100_greatest_guitarists_of_all_time/1
Well, according to Rolling Stone magazine at least. This is as of 2003 so it's a bit dated but not too much. Some of these guys I've never heard of, some l strongly disagree with their ranking and some belong where they are. Doesn't matter. It's interesting reading on such a wide variety of genres and history. And technical prowess is not the sole criteria but also influence in the progression of music through the years.http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/5937559/the_100_greatest_guitarists_of_all_time/1
I'd put dimebag at number one, I'm not sure if anybody was even playing at his level.
I"m not sure what this obsession with evidence is
While dimebag was an amazing guitarist, there are PLENTY of Guitar players that are technically superior. I can't pay any attention to that list knowing David Gilmour is at 82...give me a break. Garbage.
But when I listen to dimebag's solos, I don't hear anyone playing like him.
I went through all 100 guys and it's a bit of a strange list. It seems rather biased to "old school" and even prejudiced against "speed" guitarists. I would have thought Satriani, Malmsteen, Buckethead etc would show up. And some guy from the Stooges makes the list. And Cobain is in the top 20? I would have put Jerry Cantrell in his place for grunge influence.Oh well...
they should pay homage to santana.
The Santana/Rob Thomas song is a good example. Matchbox 20 is crappy pop music and with the help of Santana, Rob Thomas actually produced a good song! Now THAT'S worthy of notoriety!
Quote from: peewee_RotA on October 15, 2009, 06:31:23 PMThe Santana/Rob Thomas song is a good example. Matchbox 20 is crappy pop music and with the help of Santana, Rob Thomas actually produced a good song! Now THAT'S worthy of notoriety!Nope, Rob Thomas ruined it with his cerebral palsy-ish singing.