Complaint Letter About TastySpleen

[m0n0LiTh0]

               

My complaint about TastySpleen
At the risk of sounding like a dour frotteurism enthusiast, I will attempt to humbly set forth a brief précis of TastySpleen's most abominable fusillades in hopes of convincing you, the reader, to help act honorably. Let me begin by observing that the proverbs of Theognis, like those of Solomon, are observations on human nature, ordinary life, and civil society, with moral reflections on the facts. I quote him as a witness of the fact that I have a plan to prevent the production of a new crop of censorious boeotians. I call this plan "Operation deal with TastySpleen's dotty, inattentive quips on a case-by-case basis". (Granted, I need a shorter, catchier name, but that one will do for now.) My plan's underlying motif is that it's easy for us to shake our heads at TastySpleen's foolishness and cowardice. It's easy for us to exclaim that we should build a sane and healthy society free of TastySpleen's destructive influences. It's easy for us to say, "TastySpleen should be in better control of its hormones." The point is that it's easy for us to say these things because noisome loudmouths like TastySpleen are not born—they are excreted. However unsavory that metaphor may be, TastySpleen says it's going to force me to shake in my boots from fear before you know it. Is it out of its gruesome mind? The answer is fairly obvious when you consider that its subordinates actually believe the bunkum they're always mouthing. That's because these classes of disdainful proponents of priggism are idealistic, have no sense of history or human nature, and they think that what they're doing will improve the world in the near future. In reality, of course, TastySpleen should work with us, not step in at the eleventh hour and hog all the glory. 

Do you think I'm the only one who wants to challenge the soft bigotry of low expectations? I assure you, I am not. But if we were to let TastySpleen get away with funding, assembling, and training peremptory peculators to rob, steal, cheat, and murder, that would be a gross miscarriage of justice. TastySpleen wants us to believe that a totalitarian dictatorship is the best form of government we could possibly have. How stupid does it think we are? Apparently, even know-it-all TastySpleen doesn't know the answer to that one. It wouldn't matter if it did, given that if you looked up "homicidal" in the dictionary, you'd probably see its logo.

TastySpleen uses its influence to coordinate a revolution. Let me try to explain what I mean by that in a single sentence: We're all in this mess together. Excuse me; that's not entirely correct. What I meant to say is that TastySpleen occasionally writes letters accusing me and my friends of being the most dodgy prevaricators I've ever seen. These letters are typically couched in gutter language (which is doubtless the language in which TastySpleen habitually thinks) and serve no purpose other than to convince me that it has been trying to trick people into believing that mediocrity and normalcy are ideal virtues. Apparently, it has succeeded beyond its wildest dreams with morally crippled, foolhardy dunderheads; they're now fully convinced that TastySpleen's writings will spread enlightenment to the masses, nurture democracy, reestablish the bonds of community, bring us closer to God, and generally work to the betterment of Man and society. Anyway, that's it for this letter. Let TastySpleen read it and weep.

 Now i feel lots better..........

                                                         LOL J/K

[[BTF] Reflex]

I almost want to move this to "Error and Glitch" demo's,  but there is no demo

 

[m0n0LiTh0]

                                http://www.pakin.org/complaint

[[BTF] Reflex]

Omg that's awesome.

[peewee_RotA]

But I must explain to you how all this mistaken idea of denouncing pleasure and praising pain was born and I will give you a complete account of the system, and expound the actual teachings of the great explorer of the truth, the master-builder of human happiness. No one rejects, dislikes, or avoids pleasure itself, because it is pleasure, but because those who do not know how to pursue pleasure rationally encounter consequences that are extremely painful. Nor again is there anyone who loves or pursues or desires to obtain pain of itself, because it is pain, but because occasionally circumstances occur in which toil and pain can procure him some great pleasure. To take a trivial example, which of us ever undertakes laborious physical exercise, except to obtain some advantage from it? But who has any right to find fault with a man who chooses to enjoy a pleasure that has no annoying consequences, or one who avoids a pain that produces no resultant pleasure?