Quote from: VaeVictiswell ubuntu is main stream stuff, its aimed to be easy... its got a lot of stuff preconfigured and its got a lot of stuff pre-installed, the package manager gui makes getting stuff a breeze... so it is an easier distro... however when something DOES break in ubuntu, its a total bitch :/I'm not sure what you mean, if something breaks running on another version of Linux it's not any easier to fix. If you upgrade the entire Operating System and there is some kind of an issue that's not exactly surprising. You also have the option to install the programs yourself, so that's not any different, besides that you had the option of something that will make the programs work fo ryou on command. I would consider it easier to fix something with more support, and Ubuntu has a lot of that. Also they both can run SELinux and other similar configurations. I could see an argument about security, that the code is better analyzed or mainted in other operating systems, but there will always be mistakes and a choice has to be made.Quote from: Vaevictisarch on the other hand, you do everything yourself, its minimalistic, very fast, the install guide is like 10 pages long lol not very easy for newer users and harder to set up... but once you do get it all set up its golden, if something breaks, you should know what broke because you did it all, and theres not a million things that could break there is only what you put there, its much faster and smaller due to it being self built and not adding a bunch of junk that you dont need like ubuntu does... there are other reasons but i cant think of any right now slipped my mind i guess Setting up a program in Arch can be no different than Ubuntu, and there are a million things to go wrong, the kernel is a large program and there's still all the same utilities and programs. How is it faster? I click something and instant on Arch or Ubuntu.
well ubuntu is main stream stuff, its aimed to be easy... its got a lot of stuff preconfigured and its got a lot of stuff pre-installed, the package manager gui makes getting stuff a breeze... so it is an easier distro... however when something DOES break in ubuntu, its a total bitch :/
arch on the other hand, you do everything yourself, its minimalistic, very fast, the install guide is like 10 pages long lol not very easy for newer users and harder to set up... but once you do get it all set up its golden, if something breaks, you should know what broke because you did it all, and theres not a million things that could break there is only what you put there, its much faster and smaller due to it being self built and not adding a bunch of junk that you dont need like ubuntu does... there are other reasons but i cant think of any right now slipped my mind i guess